From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 376E11F910 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 13:36:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=gmx.de header.i=@gmx.de header.b="iHi/xoye"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231175AbiKJNfj (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Nov 2022 08:35:39 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53336 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231156AbiKJNfe (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Nov 2022 08:35:34 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 212FEB850 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 05:35:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.de; s=s31663417; t=1668087328; bh=QywPtzySu+6NWQetdxQHVpzu06nJurEeui+WNnqEK0c=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=iHi/xoye82uEChWdHqvajmN1DqqaJyYRM0TT0Y7IBe8+RXuYu+5iPlS1kPcaOcznw eb5dDS5OvSpW+d/pm7/1IANqWu4cf49kSptWPLUJb6PFpcfWDUF+Yh9fyL9L+nsGCs grZ6cz4Mk1WVTj/WynZje3jsgnQVNSxdG+yYciV0/rytPnaNX3lqfipBQx0Uc/9vjN jzxDtFcCVDS90df8M55hVq25+RGZJGXAgmTMRT+hAGuIIaxMGE6WtEAbkDjpA4Dag3 p6dWRtx9FvOxmK7X+svztXgWr19GtyGgaHhO/lqqxZ0stfczwdpJmjsSdtQ6YLWqGP qn1Oc9Mn9xLmA== X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a Received: from [172.27.167.171] ([213.196.213.188]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MYNJg-1oXYJu16QM-00VLl3; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 14:35:28 +0100 Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 14:35:26 +0100 (CET) From: Johannes Schindelin To: Taylor Blau cc: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=86var_Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0_Bjarmason?= , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: js/bisect-in-c (was: What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2022, #09; Mon, 31)) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <8r1s24sp-8p26-sr61-3pp0-8o7r6pr72641@tzk.qr> References: <221102.86cza52rt0.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="8323328-481353447-1668087328=:16139" X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:rdwAKpv1FeLFzsGU540cVVbryDTPzLmqKez08LB5HrA7Wy1p/JW BZtR79L3nmRtp7SeDL786qGweQEV5Pzpdge6iqBBQg49LNylef1OYGA9xRfEf9sV/KOnmRc +YEsL+H1dAix1OgE1W083B9X4qHzL5kTT6BbPkO/Q5Y4QOZ/xOC4D/hqB5CgCDQlkwOg2qh rDeX+dZpewxDaZJ+qloLA== UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:x3NThn+pMrs=;mOmzhrISqCt/Opkx+uDDLATc/W3 unIHREU9upaicbCgLteEPx7wwUcNdmYsHyUptjiEzPRF1n0RHyne2bJmIbG976VxdTc2HSjcu QIcTZ4UnL3j0MVQyFde67Z+3vmy2ttQq7L2ohrKAyiPZ46YushmQdRaZCOnWdEo5TtJC5MSvZ xJg2d1yEIrxo8p5OOab2hzBxlSZNG1VEN5QVAha9pozHEK7+o469f6pB4dzd8SgdR+z50dZoh dVbIxQRqfaAlUYnQCKR8mIg/Src5QRsU6O1/CPZH/Ly96rM+7w0NkpvoSHBtNxG1TgLsx9kW3 1dLSCKVzcok8LsoT1lHYQTLdnpIpQgQYeBrO3Rmgpg2uRtK8Q+471ReomGyrI0JBvgUxz+gzC Fsx9udwuV62PTibmoJMN9MiGU5wqWCk6IBaeCHYMFApfinxC5xQZNQ1flGnezH8yPi73En0de PiaZjpcxoqVC+eNCwvOIvoJIiM8jN013ZQWbIaovyUGpDyQHWBtOgTTR0Aog0kW6Qv7Rd7cgo 5HF3/G388hhm1wgLHE0j8R4+12CXo1qXO9hBbYBTN43rjMWujTQ75WPtF2r851dWdIecN5534 TPIeXJF/a/Awj9r/Js9oOZgCJyfhf4dwHUhJnsa+vFiskRZ3g3t6NtILQaFwwGbLhaTmuNIfV Nr2/h1lH73xkikTzk435BPYrhsczAIADd5GGuy/I9n4pyf5i4XVajcEK3cpx3ZvO7ewRH3TJm 6B6ULQd6q6JhiGQzHT8B3Cw1BCr5XjJjOebWbHNFCs4jM1gRexS4ini9Xzhq81KE3s9jkppX2 1I31w3PyHqkYHInps1Vsi5GAVSij6M6NVAvt/SeDwnyxZBLpgZ12OyNxjw7V+ngBe+tQsqrGe jBLjYmIAZWKun6qLeN0H+k03vZB04LiuuWHkmQo8xXgJndp3q+szGxSYN5cOc4yB8AhIiEA2a 1ZSysSnToSxRr3bhtCQ645K7C80= Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323328-481353447-1668087328=:16139 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Taylor, On Wed, 2 Nov 2022, Taylor Blau wrote: > On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 06:22:17PM +0100, =C3=86var Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0 B= jarmason wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 31 2022, Taylor Blau wrote: > > > > > What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2022, #09; Mon, 31) > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > * js/bisect-in-c (2022-08-30) 17 commits > > > . bisect: no longer try to clean up left-over `.git/head-name` file= s > > > . bisect: remove Cogito-related code > > > . Turn `git bisect` into a full built-in > > > . bisect: move even the command-line parsing to `bisect--helper` > > > . bisect--helper: make `state` optional > > > . bisect--helper: calling `bisect_state()` without an argument is a= bug > > > . bisect: avoid double-quoting when printing the failed command > > > . bisect run: fix the error message > > > . bisect: verify that a bogus option won't try to start a bisection > > > . bisect--helper: migrate to OPT_SUBCOMMAND() > > > . bisect--helper: make the order consistently `argc, argv` > > > . bisect--helper: make `terms` an explicit singleton > > > . bisect--helper: simplify exit code computation > > > . bisect--helper: really retire `--bisect-autostart` > > > . bisect--helper: really retire --bisect-next-check > > > . bisect--helper: retire the --no-log option > > > . Merge branch 'sg/parse-options-subcommand' into js/bisect-in-c > > > > > > Final bits of "git bisect.sh" have been rewritten in C. > > > > > > Needs review. > > > cf. > > > source: > > > > I see this has been ejected out of "seen", presumably due to the > > outstanding conflicts. > > If I recall correctly, I ejected this one due to its age and lack of > attention. If you want to reroll it or if Johannes wants to take a look, > I'd be appreciative. My last information was that I sent an iteration that was designed to address all outstanding concerns, including a rather major haul to put this on top of the new `OPT_SUBCOMMAND` feature that wasn't even dreamed of when I sent v1 of `bisect-in-c`, and then I only saw "Needs review." for several weeks and nobody objecting but also in particular =C3=86var (w= ho raised concerns against this patch series several times over the last 10 months) not chiming in with a "go ahead". So basically, I thought this was finally done and the next thing I hear is that it is ejected. That's quite a frustrating experience, I must admit. At least I am not a new contributor who would be very much deterred from contributing any further by such an experience. Ciao, Dscho --8323328-481353447-1668087328=:16139--