From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB7861F953 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 11:02:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238133AbiAKLCA (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jan 2022 06:02:00 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36952 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235439AbiAKLCA (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jan 2022 06:02:00 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x331.google.com (mail-wm1-x331.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::331]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2A78C06173F for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 03:01:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x331.google.com with SMTP id c126-20020a1c9a84000000b00346f9ebee43so1563385wme.4 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 03:01:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:reply-to:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=YiDllnMxRN8vN6jps3Jqf5+QqjqRSgs6hBNkredewDQ=; b=HpnfGTA9qqW5yH0QG+e9lD3jl1LnLktWjJWiTUjXEKPBzj/ER7x1Nw53atLEt0mUf3 OoYyi+gCOSfIjAA2M3gqjCbRJx+fXh0pstgmjb/dDPIiFZOB5u44fjb3a4wBQo8MFdVo RGnUrmmXJO3PU6ASiS35Vo7qO7WU6gsRFEPjqdeID6Ozbeu9wYUbOD0GCG7VzsDFwD4f umMITGPPAx45Cq23LQbylzUPt8hLUdTJx7aqNL3mJ1TGBHYGMmHZQ1mhCPJZSVDEVK5C Zv8IPdlOzgwOg83Qd69hJFv4Egw/HWEAFLI5hZTToKUH1t+8DWTvIwMkXQxIjsVQ1yFu NxPg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:reply-to :subject:content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=YiDllnMxRN8vN6jps3Jqf5+QqjqRSgs6hBNkredewDQ=; b=dhTDL+WDAw7NYh+uM+EzX4QhlWbN9vZQJP1qqXnsO4BQV/PTT/e6ZsQ8fQl+UUQAMo dtuafLCKcFDAVNOcuYCm6YYrCILjRhuozRklcF52NVaLdbNnZQt34VV4rQiJA2LLx8D2 mxfF+a5hC1BtgZhjcCYlTuuzBGOgk9WGg1h6biz3lvWOb/LzQj0lSFYq7BEgfxGtofmN mlucoBsBw4SPTZxT5gGK6MxOMJ+wpN9j4K9NXtWcbyD7jhJXCMqtJsxKAPXW0/ie1tzm D60ZvgT+ykReEm/CcrqoK6Bz2WcY9CfMTF/zVN3kEfVrhpOoJvuR8EXh+mend9UkFMDo qmUA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532n2VGPOGGKTPIb1RulY+AFBMX3wvmQlNj+wdclu0ip6Q2FBESB rdw4aSWBNOq5+X3z6qVeCXw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx0FPZ7FzBVdewvFes1cjowL9igh77sXwXnWoGJBbPeIfPB0Nx9AyMQrHoYS3+2M9WYhkvAgg== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:c917:: with SMTP id f23mr2027633wmb.10.1641898918315; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 03:01:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.201] ([31.185.185.186]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id t7sm1423221wmq.42.2022.01.11.03.01.56 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 11 Jan 2022 03:01:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8d07e92e-b63a-6be4-6999-79c36ca07cb5@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 11:01:55 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.1 Reply-To: phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] name-rev: deprecate --stdin in favor of --annotate-stdin Content-Language: en-US To: Junio C Hamano , John Cai Cc: John Cai via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Schindelin References: <153f69ea9b6cfc3fff47c91fa237cf97efd6bfae.1641425372.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> <56FFAD1E-D081-4D13-A12E-DD6807375B69@gmail.com> From: Phillip Wood In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On 10/01/2022 19:11, Junio C Hamano wrote: > John Cai writes: > >>> As I said, my mention of hidden vs non-hidden was not my preferrence >>> of non-hidden over hidden, but was soliciting opinions from others, >>> so I was a bit surprised to see a reroll to change only that thing >>> and nothing else so soon. >>> >>> But if it is your preference to leave it unhidden for now, that is >>> fine as well. I have no strong preference over the matter either >>> way. >> >> I think it makes sense in this first iteration to keep it >> non-hidden for visibility purposes. Maybe in the next release we >> can make it hidden before we move it altogether. > > I think that is a sensible way forward. I agree Thanks Phillip