From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Lars Hjemli" Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] git-merge: add support for --commit Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 12:35:54 +0200 Message-ID: <8c5c35580709230335w2b4dcfe8xa05d50312cc2f6c3@mail.gmail.com> References: <1190421186-21784-1-git-send-email-hjemli@gmail.com> <1190421186-21784-2-git-send-email-hjemli@gmail.com> <1190421186-21784-3-git-send-email-hjemli@gmail.com> <1190421186-21784-4-git-send-email-hjemli@gmail.com> <1190421186-21784-5-git-send-email-hjemli@gmail.com> <7vir62dx0u.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: "Junio C Hamano" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Sep 23 12:36:06 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IZOok-0002YL-TH for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 12:36:03 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754555AbXIWKf5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Sep 2007 06:35:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754459AbXIWKf5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Sep 2007 06:35:57 -0400 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.178]:5003 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754161AbXIWKf4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Sep 2007 06:35:56 -0400 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id v27so1634478wah for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 03:35:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=cWLCHwk55pvfsfgdV/34cuyTMJUVYWSRWPp4dMQaEfo=; b=hTQefwzW55ZFrepTU/oeCZGuuGAafPX4MmzwHFOHHikgWkb0dlSqEL3vWMoie2sCGt2PV3jEuTLDAVvLTjwy04HZul8A6/KTodvq6ptekIWul563pmXLwm8el7sVMW0ag+w/+QshjlydrHor0zXwD1DBqsyoF6YItW4iX/k5oeU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=IxBSnQOnB0SZGdlna2QVSsdvBeUidiRSC3HiCduzgRBW0jZhQv++cajaNxsY+8/3sZvDMaMcrX56Qc07cbPB0cQe9ZQjXP3bAkjNEEFOOZuftL9oQ8Ugn3Kn+23rxMIzkPUh+4XMkMqMQMV3TdEtUCB8scyR+9wzkygEWTK8qUQ= Received: by 10.114.159.1 with SMTP id h1mr1594725wae.1190543754806; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 03:35:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.235.4 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 03:35:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7vir62dx0u.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 9/23/07, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Lars Hjemli writes: > > > This option can be used to override --no-commit and --squash. The change > > also introduces slightly different behavior for --no-commit: when specified, > > it explicitly overrides --squash. > > Makes me wonder if --no-squash also make sense to override a --squash. > Is this really needed? IOW, does it ever make sense to have --no-commit > in the configuration? > Actually, I did add --no-squash but the semantics (and implementation) was identical to --commit so I decided it wasn't worth it (but maybe it is - just to avoid user confusion?). -- larsh