From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5069B1F453 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 07:01:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729230AbeKEQTy (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Nov 2018 11:19:54 -0500 Received: from bsmtp7.bon.at ([213.33.87.19]:3067 "EHLO bsmtp7.bon.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729000AbeKEQTy (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Nov 2018 11:19:54 -0500 Received: from dx.site (unknown [93.83.142.38]) by bsmtp7.bon.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 42pNrj1F6Wz5tmD; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 08:01:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by dx.site (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB46D221C; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 08:01:40 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] poll: use GetTickCount64() to avoid wrap-around issues To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Carlo Arenas , shoelzer@gmail.com, gitgitgadget@gmail.com, git@vger.kernel.org, johannes.schindelin@gmx.de References: <69bc5924f94b56f92d9653b3a64f721bd03f1956.1541020294.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> <46aa1893-095b-9f0c-4989-e63ebaa88705@kdbg.org> From: Johannes Sixt Message-ID: <8b22754b-89ec-ae04-c839-83810f93872f@kdbg.org> Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 08:01:40 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Am 05.11.18 um 00:26 schrieb Junio C Hamano: > OK, thanks. It seems that the relative silence after this message > is a sign that the resulting patch after squashing is what everybody > is happey with? I'm not 100% happy. I'll resend a squashed patch, but it has to wait as I have to catch a train now. Appologies for the sub-optimal submission process. -- Hannes