From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E20A20A29 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 15:39:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751959AbdIUPjg (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Sep 2017 11:39:36 -0400 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]:54802 "EHLO mail-out.m-online.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751957AbdIUPje (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Sep 2017 11:39:34 -0400 Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3xyglR1X22z1r3bZ; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 17:39:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3xyglQ3jN3z1qrll; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 17:39:30 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1HxIdy39fnyi; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 17:39:29 +0200 (CEST) X-Auth-Info: lCRI2xoeN3YvFJny0rlxt4DjESK211EDFLpI/pDJQQS0Q3PehRyckLglN1+DsyW4 Received: from igel.home (ppp-88-217-30-250.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.30.250]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 17:39:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3F0F12C2317; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 17:39:29 +0200 (CEST) From: Andreas Schwab To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Jonathan Nieder , Kaartic Sivaraam , Michael Haggerty , Alex Riesen , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] for_each_string_list_item: avoid undefined behavior for empty list References: <20170915184323.GU27425@aiede.mtv.corp.google.com> <20170920023008.GB126984@aiede.mtv.corp.google.com> <20170920052705.GC126984@aiede.mtv.corp.google.com> <87vakd2v22.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <20170920173134.GZ27425@aiede.mtv.corp.google.com> <87lgl9rqbq.fsf@linux-m68k.org> X-Yow: NOW, I'm supposed to SCRAMBLE two, and HOLD th' MAYO!! Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 17:39:29 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Thu, 21 Sep 2017 10:12:48 +0900") Message-ID: <87y3p8uklq.fsf@linux-m68k.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Sep 21 2017, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Now you make me curious. How would that variant be different from > option C. in Jonathan's message? Only in the parity of the condition. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."