From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Rast Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 42/45] add tests for rebasing merged history Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2013 19:25:56 +0200 Message-ID: <87wqq3ci1n.fsf@hexa.v.cablecom.net> References: <1370796057-25312-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <1370796057-25312-43-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: , Junio C Hamano , "Ramkumar Ramachandra" , Jonathan Nieder , Martin von Zweigbergk , "Martin von Zweigbergk" To: Felipe Contreras X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Jun 09 19:26:08 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UljNT-000191-Ec for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 19:26:03 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751390Ab3FIRZ7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Jun 2013 13:25:59 -0400 Received: from edge20.ethz.ch ([82.130.99.26]:36792 "EHLO edge20.ethz.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751184Ab3FIRZ7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Jun 2013 13:25:59 -0400 Received: from CAS20.d.ethz.ch (172.31.51.110) by edge20.ethz.ch (82.130.99.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.298.4; Sun, 9 Jun 2013 19:25:43 +0200 Received: from hexa.v.cablecom.net.ethz.ch (46.126.8.85) by CAS20.d.ethz.ch (172.31.51.110) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.298.4; Sun, 9 Jun 2013 19:25:56 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1370796057-25312-43-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> (Felipe Contreras's message of "Sun, 9 Jun 2013 11:40:54 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) X-Originating-IP: [46.126.8.85] Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Felipe Contreras writes: > +#TODO: make order consistent across all flavors of rebase > +test_run_rebase success 'd e n o' '' > +test_run_rebase success 'd e n o' -m > +test_run_rebase success 'd n o e' -i [45/45] would seem to imply that these tests fail as of this patch. Is that correct? If so, please either squash that change or move the test further up marked as 'failure'. -- Thomas Rast trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch