From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B41DC1F5AE for ; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 14:08:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230526AbhFLOJn (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jun 2021 10:09:43 -0400 Received: from vps.thesusis.net ([34.202.238.73]:55430 "EHLO vps.thesusis.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230191AbhFLOJm (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jun 2021 10:09:42 -0400 Received: by vps.thesusis.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C4DD730658; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 10:07:12 -0400 (EDT) References: <60be91757c6ca_db80d2086e@natae.notmuch> <87czsu98ar.fsf@vps.thesusis.net> <790688e5-6816-9837-85e7-2fdbbdf24169@gmail.com> User-agent: mu4e 1.5.13; emacs 27.1 From: Phillip Susi To: Derrick Stolee Cc: Felipe Contreras , Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com, sandals@crustytoothpaste.net, jrnieder@gmail.com, emilyshaffer@google.com, Derrick Stolee , Derrick Stolee Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Documentation: use singular they when appropriate Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2021 10:02:24 -0400 In-reply-to: <790688e5-6816-9837-85e7-2fdbbdf24169@gmail.com> Message-ID: <87wnqzp46n.fsf@vps.thesusis.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Derrick Stolee writes: > Singular "they" works the same as singular "you". For example: > > ...means that _you are_ completely satisfied... > > Singular "you" had a similar backlash in the 1660s as singular "they" > is having in this thread, but singular "you" has lasted (and we use > "thou" only to signify someone using old-timey language). Oh weird... the big debate with you always was that we have no plural version of it to use when referring to a group of people, and it was plural all along, but is still used when referring to only one person.