git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>,
	Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>,
	Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>,
	Robert Foss <robert.foss@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] send-email: don't needlessly abs_path() the core.hooksPath
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 14:09:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v977m2q6.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqq35ubgwpy.fsf@gitster.g>


On Tue, May 25 2021, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> The repo_path() function was introduced in c8243933c74, so it's never
>> been in a release, thus I think it's fine to alter its behavior.
>>
>> The code here doesn't need to concern itself with what needs to be
>> relative to what, you run send-email in some working tree directory (or
>> top-level), and depending on core.hooksPath we'll either return a
>> relative path to the .git/hooks or an absolute one, the system()
>> invocation will accept either.
>
> All of that are convincing, but I'd rather not risk it.  I'll take
> your 1/2 with J6t's fix, both of which are obvious and no brainer,
> but I am willing to take this 2/2 as a post-release clean-up next
> monght, though ;-)

Fair enough. I get that we're in the rc phase, but FWIW I still
disagree.

I do think supporting whatever edge case we're exposing by
round-tripping through abs_path() and its subtly different behavior is
worse than a change to make us rely on the well-understood rev-parse
behavior directly.

Especially since the fix is to something that didn't work to begin with
before the v2.32.0 release is out (core.hooksPath + send-email), but
perhaps that's more of an argument for reverting the topic during RC +
try to have it land in v2.33.0?

And that + what seems to be the prevailing (IMO nonsensical) opinion on
Git.pm's stability promise, meaning that once this new function is out
in a release we'll be stuck supporting it makes me want to change this
pre-release.

But I'll leave it to you, if you are convinced and do want to take this
2/2 after all I'll submit another trivial patch on top to remove the new
(then unused) repo_path function, which we expect to go away anyway.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-25 12:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-24 19:38 [PATCH] t9001-send-email.sh: fix expected absolute paths on Windows Johannes Sixt
2021-05-24 20:26 ` Jonathan Nieder
2021-05-24 22:15 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-05-24 23:15   ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-05-24 23:14 ` [PATCH 0/2] send-email: pre-release fixes for v2.32.0 Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-05-24 23:14   ` [PATCH 1/2] send-email: fix missing error message regression Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-05-24 23:14   ` [PATCH 2/2] send-email: don't needlessly abs_path() the core.hooksPath Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-05-25  1:03     ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-25  5:57       ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-05-25  6:13         ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-05-25  6:21           ` Robert Foss
2021-05-25  6:21         ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-25 12:09           ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [this message]
2021-05-25 19:28             ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-26 11:21               ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-05-26 11:21                 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-05-26 11:21                 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] send-email: move "hooks_path" invocation to git-send-email.perl Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-05-26  1:22         ` [PATCH 2/2] send-email: don't needlessly abs_path() the core.hooksPath Felipe Contreras
2021-05-25  6:10       ` Robert Foss
2021-06-02 11:40 ` [PATCH] t9001-send-email.sh: fix expected absolute paths on Windows Johannes Schindelin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87v977m2q6.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com \
    --to=avarab@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=j6t@kdbg.org \
    --cc=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
    --cc=robert.foss@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).