From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E72F1F5AE for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 11:47:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231742AbhGVLGx (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jul 2021 07:06:53 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36748 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231566AbhGVLGw (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jul 2021 07:06:52 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x52b.google.com (mail-ed1-x52b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 700ECC061575 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 04:47:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id ca14so6431931edb.2 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 04:47:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:references:user-agent:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version; bh=Ixeuir2m01ifIu2qgAfG5uo1WNsh7u8/a1ZP362XkA4=; b=UBmAaJWa1aWOWmh5dY2mix2v0F9jJBAUrYeyJFgbuqB01awbXHVdmDnvn+jUqb+9Nw hLf22d9fYJMz7jka8SfUSiyZwDHphRVF2TpW3tmyAZDPPsm97Brx3DpnGw5EG6bn/QgU tZsOtffHCergwaFBUyXiPxBbHSvQ77TQH/kkQWwevD5EMtJm9YZI1SwkdbtjO144Ft/R oW4Z1ncZAujxorloyWhY0JlL54puHZCv9VH7Y10bfT+jLSFowQetfrbeRoJfUuFUEIM0 NOUxkPSvN1354zauHbEPBZVIO77KP/JK5LL6E6qPqr4kXhil2t+nz3JRwz09elyUOnpm Wnxw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:references:user-agent :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version; bh=Ixeuir2m01ifIu2qgAfG5uo1WNsh7u8/a1ZP362XkA4=; b=i9/KwQnv/yf7md03xrHKwyEv1uhAWmsLS8T835dvJ+RjpFnX+VL7pOEc1XBmmQxaGz CmKElfJL6no8v9x4iucp3Wc8x1uFme34MNUsmn4gPBWDJxIUnJDJGuRF9321LM6bnqrc 489LE4koLVvuHN5oIFwd68+eUwDR1CW8bfax/Mhb/so3vkjIlGapjMIsRiYhYawfmQxs QsuEqu7UYZLp/PuAkik+Z0EIv6A/vsvra5rfaOUxITohSgGOfjA8OAGWTxf+ZCs49KC+ QBuIAdegECqlNGPaHTr79Iwjz4q6+fF7Be9Qy67XAPm2+lz12zIQyNlQHH0ALVhbaEnl DIvg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531nr/Yzw3dxU0z1r4Q8XY4603Yp+1w19Km1IfzKtp7i9y6EapEv n+wB1KEU+5bXVj+wnouHQ3M= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyz/n8KVdn0N4D8yxFifJxzYu6hqK3SeemJqW7bwKLc4OgdJz9gEnQd0UgQm9iBGkFIGl15xw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:2213:: with SMTP id cq19mr53870628edb.320.1626954445029; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 04:47:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from evledraar (j57224.upc-j.chello.nl. [24.132.57.224]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j18sm9356316ejs.114.2021.07.22.04.47.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 22 Jul 2021 04:47:24 -0700 (PDT) From: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason To: Philip Oakley Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] bundle doc: elaborate on rev<->ref restriction Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 13:46:58 +0200 References: <68ea4cc0-b9d3-a7fb-7c22-fa828f9dc52f@iee.email> <27ad38c9-699e-0a9b-1bef-3c5d2950cd02@iee.email> User-agent: Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye); Emacs 27.1; mu4e 1.5.13 In-reply-to: <27ad38c9-699e-0a9b-1bef-3c5d2950cd02@iee.email> Message-ID: <87v952tvrz.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 22 2021, Philip Oakley wrote: > On 21/07/2021 17:57, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Philip Oakley writes: >> >>> Should the `list-heads` option be mentioned for investigating existing >>> bundles? >> I think 'list-heads' has been listed in the options section. > > True, it's why I was suggesting pointing at that route for the extra > details that are beyond just a set of refs. > >> I >> however may encourage people to use "git ls-remote one.bndl" over >> "git bundle list-heads one.bndl"---they do the same thing, no? > > It is good to provide both directions to the user. The formats may be > different but the content is essentially the same, and redirecting users > to the more core command is useful. > I'll work those suggestions into a future update of the docs I have queued, but for now I think talking about list-heads v.s. ls-remote doesn't have much directly to do with this particular series, correct?