From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 090F61F4B4 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 12:41:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241228AbhDLMl5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Apr 2021 08:41:57 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59298 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S241214AbhDLMlz (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Apr 2021 08:41:55 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x529.google.com (mail-ed1-x529.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::529]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0FDCC061574 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 05:41:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x529.google.com with SMTP id e7so14850823edu.10 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 05:41:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:user-agent:in-reply-to:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Zg6UDmXoHLtyVnM8ebgcqOpi+F3i2iKBo8EksA8oL3w=; b=mqLx3xamr5UdNMgH/6sgBMd6u+Rkc6jlFXrI9Z4z7IrdjMw6sXTcVrcihYTqFiP4fL TDhP93c4kpTtYsxw0gxLUgmqVGF7IDu3Ome+ILPw5tjVBjXj7OxldezC31J97OboGXG4 VmErnL0/ukzvfz7aT/u7cpxW9Dq4X0TkFypLXS68tApTOmtKGYnQHYVMl3zNC0Q/24LX bF1OHgHKLtwNu0glSqmLT8WN+xUpXUI6sXR705N1R0D+E8400sMaiptOayNRmwKpNzSE zFJw4IF+qHdeik5RFwKhe4VlSh7e0Y5RQlNF3/wX0a+e0ba+7i8bj2KR07g1VielF8xa IEuA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:user-agent :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Zg6UDmXoHLtyVnM8ebgcqOpi+F3i2iKBo8EksA8oL3w=; b=YUY8ugtmNnzvOveNStk/5S0QEL3cShbDjmEOnQ/OMZBaA5GDGA6UoW/TntLGnA0d6P z9WO0s45sDJ++g/cafgXn0W9+YTGj9AOqgKwUscSGGnD6vVg0yTSltHwmgKSd2x+e3Yf vRK0UQoZoS1mSvJuSEnmwEQKEP3+Ov5LFpPlCc6+RIayn/WqEQGtISVxdVxzVtlNNxzt wRn8WVX8foUGxWTlidGKi5x/qrls8bkWg53ZO+Ojf5h3AHawD+aMPuCbgYmf/NIUe3Ho svsas7185/SWUybwMKMKMuEv5F9bMnEtg0H+/dNXZjSbR/Gvp+YbmR4E2UP6WXZmXtH+ oegw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530DheIPf1b3K9pzwGFNOT1/am1w21iwP6rKfzWGfEbOnfd8qdjw 82QExykI8ycpzNg3V5krewc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzDw5MUZFjaw4kg5UPRfwnLqIgngqYFJ2g+ke1ULc9eIw3+mQpK8MmBT50i/D4FcGThwdM/lw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:a4a:: with SMTP id bt10mr28040052edb.39.1618231296509; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 05:41:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from evledraar (j57224.upc-j.chello.nl. [24.132.57.224]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a22sm6590096edu.14.2021.04.12.05.41.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 12 Apr 2021 05:41:36 -0700 (PDT) From: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason To: Bagas Sanjaya Cc: Junio C Hamano , "brian m . carlson" , Jeff King , Git Users Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] C99: harder dependency on variadic macros References: <67645f4b-b320-3ed6-bf5d-552bae0c2688@gmail.com> User-agent: Debian GNU/Linux bullseye/sid; Emacs 27.1; mu4e 1.4.15 In-reply-to: <67645f4b-b320-3ed6-bf5d-552bae0c2688@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 14:41:35 +0200 Message-ID: <87r1jfeku8.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 12 2021, Bagas Sanjaya wrote: > On 12/04/21 18.02, =C3=86var Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0 Bjarmason wrote: >> But I'm submitting this because of brian m. carlson's note[3] about >> wanting to submit more general patches for declaring a hard dependency >> on all of C99. > > I think we should bump standard requirement to C99, right? I think that's worth discussing, but isn't the topic of this more narrow change. As noted in http://lore.kernel.org/git/87wnt8eai1.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com if we simply do that some of our MSVC CI will start failing. I don't know what other compilers we need to support that may support our current subset of C99 features, but not the full set, or if e.g. the CI can simply have its MSVC compiler version bumped.