From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF2B61F5AE for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 10:19:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238920AbhDUKT7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Apr 2021 06:19:59 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58460 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234038AbhDUKTy (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Apr 2021 06:19:54 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x636.google.com (mail-ej1-x636.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::636]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41488C06174A for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:19:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x636.google.com with SMTP id u21so62739631ejo.13 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:19:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:user-agent:in-reply-to:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=VYIrEZU0gFR+7PzEquVBpwX/q9s60U8SBhpYOA0KZGw=; b=bUZottQYdrxpi/UHGCCDHd3hT8o3QUzJV90F3Vnp3S0yL6JJd+FPIzd+o2WAoeNZXv kw1JF5mJdRBrchUiaJA8fFA85Nfhxn2e+saP13pha2SINWH/g0rMJ49ZKUgvzcKz5nUW wc7ocCJ14vy+wuCaJlYOxBUxKTOEYdhFepeNJsL3br6I0cbP739ZHuwF0j2+/BHtYlVN DixxMKZk+S59C6vlConWKhJuNQNI3xA95Xk3YBdTBJ1ZW8/SU/X//IIbc563/67zpA2l 4n14i9ZzBaoVlEUGBq7sL0S1UHTT8scBJVgDlTbnfmByw8ewYXgf94HfGz1LyiBKVDcU sLqQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:user-agent :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=VYIrEZU0gFR+7PzEquVBpwX/q9s60U8SBhpYOA0KZGw=; b=QBCs6YueKw2yLJaSguOGXkWtlwPK2mnjym84lOaFQl3VEGOov4oSwxHq7CDlPcOZ+h AmDo6qmXeDp34vRGgFk1m2tq1OW2fSpLc7h/aFWIc62/rjDjc7ickMT87PvA4RsRwdAx z5MRLRyI+ANd75WnFPRcEfIqPHChC5891RC/86m62d5QdOEq7bGBw8yju3b2WB3oObjF sEho2uYMi9w2gnlMjiq0kwLXNHjFVq5GbQZWTjrnSjn7pFlNtZoVLE1mGNBDTZZqKfHL IJjl27pdWhei/yllxSNwEYG5t4a3S73VMbkbhJaxrjlkF/lJ3hn1cn29tEy1glrx6Dz7 5Vtw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533WuN77NWdpzyAVjSkZhQ7fMYrKoCdBH3CnzVUolfX43cQTVnwB qOLzKnE9AXAqFro9Pk4d72w= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzuHze33a1F499zrbPFClzSTrNc2qx6sjLFeUUAg9Cn9gZfY/FZqM2e/pPT2VFUF7pfB4LBpg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3111:: with SMTP id 17mr31590617ejx.403.1619000359933; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:19:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from evledraar (j57224.upc-j.chello.nl. [24.132.57.224]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b22sm2597848edv.96.2021.04.21.03.19.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:19:19 -0700 (PDT) From: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason To: Eric Wong Cc: Son Luong Ngoc , Jonathan Nieder , git@vger.kernel.org, Raxel Gutierrez , mricon@kernel.org, patchwork@lists.ozlabs.org, Junio C Hamano , Taylor Blau , Emily Shaffer Subject: Re: Pain points in Git's patch flow References: <20210419025754.GA26065@dcvr> User-agent: Debian GNU/Linux bullseye/sid; Emacs 27.1; mu4e 1.4.15 In-reply-to: <20210419025754.GA26065@dcvr> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 12:19:18 +0200 Message-ID: <87o8e82b4p.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 19 2021, Eric Wong wrote: > Son Luong Ngoc wrote: >> [...] >> 3. Isssue with archive: >> >> - I don't find the ML archive trivial for new comers. It took me a bit >> of time to realize: 'Oh if I scroll to bottom and find the "Thread >> overview" then I can navigate a mailing thread a lot easier'. > > (I'm the maintainer of public-inbox, the archival software you > seem to be referring to). > > I'm not sure how to make "Thread overview" easier to find > without cluttering the display near the top. Maybe I'll try > aria labels in the Subject: link... I'd say the bare-bones style of it is probably jarring to most users today. I had to check if the site even had any CSS at all. I.e. I think a more intuitive UI to users today would probably be some collapsible side-bar on the left of the screen, which would have a threaded view. The "Archives are clonable" would probably belong in some "help" tab in such a UI.