From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, T_DKIM_INVALID shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A9C81F424 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 08:34:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752656AbeDLIeX (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Apr 2018 04:34:23 -0400 Received: from mail.javad.com ([54.86.164.124]:52204 "EHLO mail.javad.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752389AbeDLIeW (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Apr 2018 04:34:22 -0400 Received: from osv (unknown [89.175.180.246]) by mail.javad.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FAF23FEBC; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 08:34:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=javad.com; s=default; t=1523522061; bh=Am9H7KKzOh5+3yIr2u0WESdrlZhpddYLw3qmo0WkdHA=; l=800; h=Received:From:To:Subject; b=UmtY8CAFgawk9c87BdW9vYlRx0VvNfl+DNsa8wCq7v6UUFLLP1Mm5/UI6JkROi+/a AO6AFzmC7y+9Jczuan/a51T4Wt/HbJTRjq7oJ90hwJzt8PQm6i5glSb7dgI1ZR/4eQ M11hmyQu3223jkpgKnADGvR+JrtuPVbfBvwVgvy8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=javad.com; s=default; t=1523522061; bh=Am9H7KKzOh5+3yIr2u0WESdrlZhpddYLw3qmo0WkdHA=; l=800; h=Received:From:To:Subject; b=UmtY8CAFgawk9c87BdW9vYlRx0VvNfl+DNsa8wCq7v6UUFLLP1Mm5/UI6JkROi+/a AO6AFzmC7y+9Jczuan/a51T4Wt/HbJTRjq7oJ90hwJzt8PQm6i5glSb7dgI1ZR/4eQ M11hmyQu3223jkpgKnADGvR+JrtuPVbfBvwVgvy8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=javad.com; s=default; t=1523522061; bh=Am9H7KKzOh5+3yIr2u0WESdrlZhpddYLw3qmo0WkdHA=; l=800; h=Received:From:To:Subject; b=UmtY8CAFgawk9c87BdW9vYlRx0VvNfl+DNsa8wCq7v6UUFLLP1Mm5/UI6JkROi+/a AO6AFzmC7y+9Jczuan/a51T4Wt/HbJTRjq7oJ90hwJzt8PQm6i5glSb7dgI1ZR/4eQ M11hmyQu3223jkpgKnADGvR+JrtuPVbfBvwVgvy8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=javad.com; s=default; t=1523522061; bh=Am9H7KKzOh5+3yIr2u0WESdrlZhpddYLw3qmo0WkdHA=; l=800; h=Received:From:To:Subject; b=UmtY8CAFgawk9c87BdW9vYlRx0VvNfl+DNsa8wCq7v6UUFLLP1Mm5/UI6JkROi+/a AO6AFzmC7y+9Jczuan/a51T4Wt/HbJTRjq7oJ90hwJzt8PQm6i5glSb7dgI1ZR/4eQ M11hmyQu3223jkpgKnADGvR+JrtuPVbfBvwVgvy8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=javad.com; s=default; t=1523522061; bh=Am9H7KKzOh5+3yIr2u0WESdrlZhpddYLw3qmo0WkdHA=; l=800; h=Received:From:To:Subject; b=UmtY8CAFgawk9c87BdW9vYlRx0VvNfl+DNsa8wCq7v6UUFLLP1Mm5/UI6JkROi+/a AO6AFzmC7y+9Jczuan/a51T4Wt/HbJTRjq7oJ90hwJzt8PQm6i5glSb7dgI1ZR/4eQ M11hmyQu3223jkpgKnADGvR+JrtuPVbfBvwVgvy8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=javad.com; s=default; t=1523522061; bh=Am9H7KKzOh5+3yIr2u0WESdrlZhpddYLw3qmo0WkdHA=; l=800; h=Received:From:To:Subject; b=UmtY8CAFgawk9c87BdW9vYlRx0VvNfl+DNsa8wCq7v6UUFLLP1Mm5/UI6JkROi+/a AO6AFzmC7y+9Jczuan/a51T4Wt/HbJTRjq7oJ90hwJzt8PQm6i5glSb7dgI1ZR/4eQ M11hmyQu3223jkpgKnADGvR+JrtuPVbfBvwVgvy8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=javad.com; s=default; t=1523522061; bh=Am9H7KKzOh5+3yIr2u0WESdrlZhpddYLw3qmo0WkdHA=; l=800; h=Received:From:To:Subject; b=UmtY8CAFgawk9c87BdW9vYlRx0VvNfl+DNsa8wCq7v6UUFLLP1Mm5/UI6JkROi+/a AO6AFzmC7y+9Jczuan/a51T4Wt/HbJTRjq7oJ90hwJzt8PQm6i5glSb7dgI1ZR/4eQ M11hmyQu3223jkpgKnADGvR+JrtuPVbfBvwVgvy8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=javad.com; s=default; t=1523522061; bh=Am9H7KKzOh5+3yIr2u0WESdrlZhpddYLw3qmo0WkdHA=; l=800; h=Received:From:To:Subject; b=UmtY8CAFgawk9c87BdW9vYlRx0VvNfl+DNsa8wCq7v6UUFLLP1Mm5/UI6JkROi+/a AO6AFzmC7y+9Jczuan/a51T4Wt/HbJTRjq7oJ90hwJzt8PQm6i5glSb7dgI1ZR/4eQ M11hmyQu3223jkpgKnADGvR+JrtuPVbfBvwVgvy8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=javad.com; s=default; t=1523522061; bh=Am9H7KKzOh5+3yIr2u0WESdrlZhpddYLw3qmo0WkdHA=; l=800; h=Received:From:To:Subject; b=UmtY8CAFgawk9c87BdW9vYlRx0VvNfl+DNsa8wCq7v6UUFLLP1Mm5/UI6JkROi+/a AO6AFzmC7y+9Jczuan/a51T4Wt/HbJTRjq7oJ90hwJzt8PQm6i5glSb7dgI1ZR/4eQ M11hmyQu3223jkpgKnADGvR+JrtuPVbfBvwVgvy8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=javad.com; s=default; t=1523522061; bh=Am9H7KKzOh5+3yIr2u0WESdrlZhpddYLw3qmo0WkdHA=; l=800; h=Received:From:To:Subject; b=UmtY8CAFgawk9c87BdW9vYlRx0VvNfl+DNsa8wCq7v6UUFLLP1Mm5/UI6JkROi+/a AO6AFzmC7y+9Jczuan/a51T4Wt/HbJTRjq7oJ90hwJzt8PQm6i5glSb7dgI1ZR/4eQ M11hmyQu3223jkpgKnADGvR+JrtuPVbfBvwVgvy8= Authentication-Results: mail.javad.com; spf=pass (sender IP is 89.175.180.246) smtp.mailfrom=osv@javad.com smtp.helo=osv Received-SPF: pass (mail.javad.com: connection is authenticated) Received: from osv by osv with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f6XgQ-0001O1-V4; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 11:34:19 +0300 From: Sergey Organov To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano , Jacob Keller , Stefan Beller , Philip Oakley , Eric Sunshine , Phillip Wood , Igor Djordjevic , Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/15] rebase -i: offer to recreate commit topology References: <87tvsj6rn2.fsf@javad.com> <871sfm737e.fsf@javad.com> <87h8oh51jm.fsf@javad.com> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 11:34:18 +0300 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Wed, 11 Apr 2018 22:40:51 +0200 (DST)") Message-ID: <87in8w2585.fsf@javad.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Hi Johannes, Johannes Schindelin writes: > Hi Sergey, > > On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, Sergey Organov wrote: > >> The RFC v2 and Phillip's strategy are essentially the same, as has been >> already shown multiple times, both theoretically and by testing. > > No, they are not. It's off-topic here. If you _really_ want to discuss it further, you are still welcome to come back to where you ran away from and continue: https://public-inbox.org/git/87po3oddl1.fsf@javad.com/ Abrupt change of the topic of discussion indicates your intention to take attention off the apparent ugliness of git rebase --rebase-merges I also get it as an indication that there are no more arguments in favor of --rebase-merges on your side, at least for now. -- Sergey