From: "Štěpán Němec" <stepnem@gmail.com>
To: Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Lodato <lodatom@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CodingGuidelines: Add a section on writing documentation
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 18:00:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fwvl2d4d.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinyPkGmsgbGM9qpXMNcZRzOXvtjDDEkJ-i3nWXz@mail.gmail.com> (Sverre Rabbelier's message of "Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:14:20 -0700")
Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com> writes:
> Heya,
>
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 04:54, Štěpán Němec <stepnem@gmail.com> wrote:
>> But given that it's only used as {0,2} at the two places right now
>> (disregarding occurences of "0{40}" in the documentation), I agree it
>> might be better to get rid of it, although I don't feel strongly about
>> it. Any other opinions?
>
> Let's get rid of it for now, we can always resurrect it later if we
> have a need for it.
OK.
>> I thought about this already when preparing the recent unification
>> series, and came to the conclusion "no, there shouldn't". :-) As the
>> examples you give show, the current usage is inconsistent, but given
>> that it brings no semantic ambiguity, I don't think it is a problem. You
>> could find more similar cosmetic inconsistencies and I don't think it
>> makes much sense to mandate any rules for such things. (But again, I
>> don't feel _too_ strongly about this either, so if more people think
>> it's worth it, I can prepare a patch that unifies them and mention the
>> preference in CodingGuidelines.)
>
> Perhaps we can set a standard to do it, but just leave the existing
> cases as is (to prevent unneeded churn)? That way we'll eventually
> converge on something.
Hm... that seems like the worst solution to me -- if we do end up
standardizing this after all, any occurence of non-standard usage would
be a bug that needs fixing (think about it from the POV of a new
contributor who reads CodingGuidelines but sees the actual usage being
different).
I guess it wouldn't be so much of a code churn to unify the spacing, but
I'm still not convinced we should be enforcing this kind of thing.
Štěpán
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-01 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-08 0:52 [PATCH/RFC] Unify argument and option notation in the docs Štěpán Němec
2010-10-08 7:43 ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-10-08 11:13 ` Štěpán Němec
2010-10-08 17:31 ` [PATCH 0/6] " Štěpán Němec
2010-10-08 17:44 ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-10-08 19:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-10-08 20:15 ` Štěpán Němec
2010-10-21 22:21 ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-10-24 15:51 ` [PATCH] CodingGuidelines: Add a section on writing documentation Štěpán Němec
2010-10-29 2:56 ` Mark Lodato
2010-10-29 11:54 ` Štěpán Němec
2010-10-29 17:14 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2010-11-01 17:00 ` Štěpán Němec [this message]
2010-11-04 17:12 ` [PATCH v2] " Štěpán Němec
2010-11-04 17:18 ` [PATCH] diff,difftool: Don't use the {0,2} notation in usage strings Štěpán Němec
2010-11-04 17:22 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2010-11-04 17:49 ` Jeff King
2010-11-04 18:02 ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-11-04 18:13 ` Jeff King
2010-11-04 18:38 ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-11-04 18:55 ` Jeff King
2010-11-04 20:26 ` Štěpán Němec
2010-11-04 20:43 ` Jeff King
2010-11-04 21:17 ` [PATCH] docs: clarify git diff modes of operation Jeff King
2010-11-04 21:50 ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-11-05 1:57 ` Mark Lodato
2010-11-04 21:51 ` Štěpán Němec
2010-11-04 21:30 ` [PATCH] diff,difftool: Don't use the {0,2} notation in usage strings Štěpán Němec
2010-10-08 17:31 ` [PATCH 1/6] Use angles for placeholders consistently Štěpán Němec
2010-10-08 17:31 ` [PATCH 2/6] Fix odd markup in --diff-filter documentation Štěpán Němec
2010-10-08 17:39 ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-10-08 17:57 ` Štěpán Němec
2010-10-08 18:03 ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-10-08 18:40 ` Štěpán Němec
2010-10-08 18:53 ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-10-08 17:31 ` [PATCH 3/6] Use parentheses and `...' where appropriate Štěpán Němec
2010-10-08 17:31 ` [PATCH 4/6] Remove stray quotes in --pretty and --format documentation Štěpán Němec
2010-10-08 17:31 ` [PATCH 5/6] Put a space between `<' and argument in pack-objects usage string Štěpán Němec
2010-10-08 17:31 ` [PATCH 6/6] Fix {update,checkout}-index usage strings Štěpán Němec
2010-10-08 16:45 ` [PATCH 0/2] pack-objects: use ALLOC_GROW in place of manual growth Jonathan Nieder
2010-10-08 16:46 ` [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: No argument of ALLOC_GROW should have side-effects Jonathan Nieder
2010-10-08 16:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] pack-objects: use ALLOC_GROW Jonathan Nieder
2010-10-08 17:02 ` [PATCH 3/2] Allow side-effects in second argument to ALLOC_GROW Jonathan Nieder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87fwvl2d4d.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=stepnem@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=lodatom@gmail.com \
--cc=srabbelier@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).