From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5403F1F935 for ; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 06:06:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S938732AbcIYGGJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Sep 2016 02:06:09 -0400 Received: from mail-io0-f195.google.com ([209.85.223.195]:35195 "EHLO mail-io0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934317AbcIYGGF (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Sep 2016 02:06:05 -0400 Received: by mail-io0-f195.google.com with SMTP id 92so3997684iom.2 for ; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 23:06:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=Of+5okrx30JTucZJzLwqCA62VN5RyQP5TGZZcfhyPN4=; b=JWyhIz9UIbhWXBUmT7Oe3FPSK3hCHAgrqaCGnW5TCz00jqREdKtPHZGr4336OPGqzQ 05rCHg2AJUZ3QHcThRNpfJJ4Pf2InjvLCeh4eH4h3QD5PJ4fkKr1LgcuRSrKi3kYXduQ yFU0ohc+bP0xpYHDK2dAy1yif1hpwvaUeWek5hOxLrz9HvSZXYps+FGQ8oP0av0jlaMs BKfZwcehyaAAFdtpw9DTVMtOBj4lwR0pjgzKqgFkaiVBHZvXogxlnIO3/kD0f/M8hGBi +qjfbHTboMYghJA+jRnTTRONpXqmYh1Zjyo+1ShpzN2aq/tHIbfp7ow2ei+3y3mn0ndA mBYw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:user-agent:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=Of+5okrx30JTucZJzLwqCA62VN5RyQP5TGZZcfhyPN4=; b=bo8Kfi1RWA7cekRjS4Cy8fFZP7oTy6B7aFUZ3nFdDgE299Z+ooOsJ463CImaf5Sd8a dBk+I8+OmLUE4zP+YlVrGev105E92MJO4jMy5K0aP47WuQAP/TGtyXFlKD9u4lHCoIPM pvErrtiC2Mystm44FZYcWf3goMzz4/9TxmJT6gcx3ESlADQp/z+7dxdtMDpdejGF96su C4uw9DmagPEt87olZpFdoVLH8W0fhTzbzzDaGSkp1w8FUlqvCzjpmfWcQEutT2KhrGlH VS55gdUn6mB6UqhJ9fo61jQOpQ3njZYhLb7LI3b14D2GUkP98yfu4jSWTtICpvjjTWuU 3nTA== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwPs3RuC8B9t9ttm7VcEtCh867FI2kB9nVR0/cZhAzAi/l7AP4Nb7EaeEfYjwVsyLA== X-Received: by 10.107.18.74 with SMTP id a71mr16119840ioj.126.1474783564648; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 23:06:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lylat (S01061859339e9903.ss.shawcable.net. [174.2.107.88]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b36sm5925682iod.36.2016.09.24.23.06.03 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sat, 24 Sep 2016 23:06:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Alex To: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Request: Extra case for %G? format User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 00:05:46 -0600 Message-ID: <87d1js1pl1.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Hello all, Could the %G? format differentiate between an unsigned commit and a signed commit that you're missing a public key for? If `git show --format=%GG --no-patch ' produces an output like the following: gpg: Signature made using RSA key ID gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found Then currently %G? results in `N', the same as an unsigned commit. In this case, could %G? please result in a new character? Perhaps `M' for "missing public key"?