From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5019E211B3 for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 19:59:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728456AbeLET7I (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Dec 2018 14:59:08 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-f66.google.com ([209.85.208.66]:41858 "EHLO mail-ed1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727388AbeLET7I (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Dec 2018 14:59:08 -0500 Received: by mail-ed1-f66.google.com with SMTP id z28so18084392edi.8 for ; Wed, 05 Dec 2018 11:59:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:user-agent:in-reply-to:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9iuXv1J3/hsoYSl3iMmZwQY6/aFZGT+IJMdm7xVX/Oo=; b=kEngyL5TohZ3/7beejEnucIoRbpVOwnmyzf6StgXsdCCIUJW5lNcczI7p6PZdX1mO1 LwoG/NtwrdxvzFySmPxxISGH5gmqH0HmzzymW1B3Sptjf5ssyF72mUk3N4o7Qbnc2Vub +Ls2Y3CFLKT4AJ+MI56EQ7q1l0vBWzKFFZyHVcAS9eZoRA3ZJrcBDq07ILc0naPm54kG BCzByhRYVHjPU12DgG+p6vMnsstD8R1rT2tZli/MjnZ5knNwF8kRfRGDnthh/wYSUz5z XSzz9p60yUDmQGAwiCh4FfBQfhSqmN5GsTHRUd3rwtInCsUaWxsszzD/hkcZmVes5DdO EvoA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:user-agent :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9iuXv1J3/hsoYSl3iMmZwQY6/aFZGT+IJMdm7xVX/Oo=; b=qASMaZowNepCUH4z/3Df0eWjz+DIL0xv2PwMh/gU3lB30cn/0kLoLciaRXtchh7Ep5 jJmr1fMr0uEu8mFyY4O3apvc0p3112K/pJ74klFJ4M7TS8LqRWZFKDRsolia0e9feYC4 q2kTdKikEGBfTP+asmu0YLY1txVhJtWafro2x16SUr/Lr/+NrAcsau6sdZ8RTdYzuZ10 XLyWOkn70kSL6Ag4mSGtqBFANaIulxp7RdJtWxDC+CZxWt/duoK4mkNndVHq923tTZTe 26gFaL9239zw8nkcKevJ/Fm3J8eVcTJdC0CBBFtLyUtqa3fvo53++2rd2/8UzGuGxdrO 96ww== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWbU1tZCp33HpHC6kmM6bbyQaRZd8+NEySj8zVeh/HM2xIItmw9a aQ94SoYWGh6KPPFsAqNWTUI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/WrVTGGgL0ZsVcV8vLK1uNEH2LBBQdJzpN4E3xSvsbGO+8tSQi+kd5fdpH3CwYeDQClnkdh1g== X-Received: by 2002:a50:d797:: with SMTP id w23mr23164971edi.19.1544039946785; Wed, 05 Dec 2018 11:59:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from evledraar (ip545586d2.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl. [84.85.134.210]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v9sm5833053edl.3.2018.12.05.11.59.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 05 Dec 2018 11:59:05 -0800 (PST) From: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason To: SZEDER =?utf-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] test-lib: add the '--stress' option to run a test repeatedly under load References: <20181204163457.15717-1-szeder.dev@gmail.com> <20181204163457.15717-4-szeder.dev@gmail.com> <87muplyxfn.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> <20181205120725.GK30222@szeder.dev> <87wooof4xm.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> <20181205143919.GN30222@szeder.dev> User-agent: Debian GNU/Linux buster/sid; Emacs 25.2.2; mu4e 1.1.0 In-reply-to: <20181205143919.GN30222@szeder.dev> Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2018 20:59:04 +0100 Message-ID: <87a7ljzqwn.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 05 2018, SZEDER Gábor wrote: > On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 03:01:41PM +0100, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: >> >> decide to stress test in advance, since we'd either flock() the trash >> >> dir, or just mktemp(1)-it. >> > >> > While 'mktemp' seems to be more portable than 'flock', it doesn't seem >> > to be portable enough; at least it's not in POSIX.> >> >> We are already relying on stuff like mktemp() being reliable for >> e.g. the split index. > > That's the mktemp() function from libc; I meant the 'mktemp' command > that we would use this early in 'test-lib.sh', where PATH has not been > set up for testing yet. Ah, if that ever becomes an issue it's a one-line test-tool wrapper.