From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: greened@obbligato.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] Add --unannotate Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 04:42:45 -0600 Message-ID: <878v84lzve.fsf@waller.obbligato.org> References: <1357012655-24974-1-git-send-email-greened@obbligato.org> <1357012655-24974-3-git-send-email-greened@obbligato.org> <7v623ga8vs.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <87sj6kfsbz.fsf@waller.obbligato.org> <7va9ss77bu.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, James Nylen To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jan 08 11:43:49 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TsWep-0002qy-NL for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 11:43:48 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755933Ab3AHKn0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2013 05:43:26 -0500 Received: from li209-253.members.linode.com ([173.255.199.253]:51726 "EHLO johnson.obbligato.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755918Ab3AHKnY (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2013 05:43:24 -0500 Received: from c-75-73-20-8.hsd1.mn.comcast.net ([75.73.20.8] helo=waller.obbligato.org) by johnson.obbligato.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1TsWm1-0003lO-Hc; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 04:51:13 -0600 In-Reply-To: <7va9ss77bu.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Tue, 01 Jan 2013 16:32:37 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) X-Filter-Spam-Score: () X-Filter-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "johnson.obbligato.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Junio C Hamano writes: > greened@obbligato.org writes: > >> In the meantime, will you apply the patch or do you prefer a new design? > > The --unannotate option will become a baggage you will have to keep > working until the end of time, if we applied it. I think it is not > too uch a baggage, so it probably is OK. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_T Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano writes: > greened@obbligato.org writes: > >> In the meantime, will you apply the patch or do you prefer a new design? > > The --unannotate option will become a baggage you will have to keep > working until the end of time, if we applied it. I think it is not > too uch a baggage, so it probably is OK. Ok. I think it's worth applying since people find it useful. It's not very complicated. -David