From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF5CE1F4B4 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 11:33:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232268AbhDOLdd (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Apr 2021 07:33:33 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56044 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230056AbhDOLdb (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Apr 2021 07:33:31 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x62a.google.com (mail-ej1-x62a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEE22C061574 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 04:33:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x62a.google.com with SMTP id g5so29643541ejx.0 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 04:33:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:user-agent:in-reply-to:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=OnbAK1Wxym0SiSXgRpzmBPyUcRj4epap0sI7cnPR1zc=; b=CE+8PmNd7i/9QfQrxQT+EURMfi+VwpCnpJ1HNAw8JIaE3QzUsJj8U0Ck8MtE8HDQYR Q0psROxQDw2y7wvBAvXlwuRP8W12QbY9IkKhL/mT5lt7q82DOmfNAAnv8RwIzssWL/MG FgKoH2PYbSCE/lYVNsQuUJejjbXrfPoRvuHyhN/as8Ebjm7lsk66Fnkqr9yIGHEhjBIJ Zuzxz0n2m1FyG/fsFIjebuLOyWtrnkJLZZdg/Ok8BapNICVZ22GVJHi2FwRo0IZTy2Zk 802bx+1R2218bNStPNO8b3Qy6ibqR6hTXnJrg90ilJXcOYncvSEcEBo73RA8M0IRmdZG MS4Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:user-agent :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=OnbAK1Wxym0SiSXgRpzmBPyUcRj4epap0sI7cnPR1zc=; b=tck2EWqEDffq3DivqZMeGqUsdhY0FlJUhN/8G6nP9Bk+/M7NVdT7GLct1FxDjOdywK SVMgxgh7lopnD4o6KADiVxitMCpRDrjySGkjosb+hWQzR7Te1FapaTH1X/7zhE2fFS/A P9eBfRqbbyn4/8zTdZAOeNeZpRwlf2csM1utA5ZsvXB3C5qL+14JMEqwU5E64T4ufRrN E8udq5y6Rh+iIeQHOSlvhc1IzpjBK17dzgSdTns6gQRqIwNkM9G3e0qDPwqVKr+T9dy8 spsSCqbR2ooVPodYhKELaKppMnIledkKtIJEcNWG9vsqJtrVlgy4NyI9e7MUEIGfpgOz +QEw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5325nBAxGuPkQjJhOX0nYkDHfxVfc68a7DOj7c4995lovMO9/gjA ks+1zqApibNM9fW19SYITNs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwaFbdunIRUkjl5m/PVfYWqX1WGFYxSI2AUhr/2//6JWUPEhPZ4sTD9gfel8q5E/qr/JiXT5g== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c29a:: with SMTP id r26mr2836318ejz.259.1618486386478; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 04:33:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from evledraar (j57224.upc-j.chello.nl. [24.132.57.224]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p22sm1704464eju.85.2021.04.15.04.33.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 15 Apr 2021 04:33:05 -0700 (PDT) From: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Eric Sunshine , "Git List" , Jeff King , Matthieu Moy , Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/16] test-lib functions: add --printf option to test_commit References: User-agent: Debian GNU/Linux bullseye/sid; Emacs 27.1; mu4e 1.4.15 In-reply-to: Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 13:33:05 +0200 Message-ID: <878s5jvl3i.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 13 2021, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Eric Sunshine writes: > >> I don't care for `--raw` either but couldn't think of anything better >> at the time. But perhaps a name such as `--allow-escapes` would be >> clearer, or perhaps not. `--c-style-escapes`? > > It's printf(1) style escapes ;-) > >> Anyhow, it's pure bikeshedding as I mentioned in my original email, so >> not a big deal. I brought it up only because the very first thought >> that popped into my head when reading the commit message saying it was >> adding `--printf` was "oh, interesting; how do I specify the arguments >> to interpolate into the `printf` format string?". So, the conclusion of this thread is let's keep it as --printf?