Re: The git spring cleanup challenge

[Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com>]

Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:

> Sergey Organov wrote:
>> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:
>> > Sergey Organov wrote:
>> >> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:
>> >> > Sergey Organov wrote:
>
>> >> >> [pull]
>> >> >> 	rebase = merges
>> >> >
>> >> > Can you do `git pull --rebase=merges` for a while?
>> >> 
>> >> I never use 'git pull' for merging, and all the time with rebasing, so
>> >> what's the point? I mean, whenever I do 'git pull' I mean 'git pull
>> >> --rebase', and whenever I need to merge, I exclusively use'git merge'.
>> >
>> > So you can remove that configuration.
>> 
>> Sorry, I can't, see below.
>> 
>> > And afterwareds set pull.rebase=true so you don't need to specify
>> > --rebase.
>> 
>> I don't get it. What's the point using pull.rebase=true instead of
>> pull.rebase=merges? The former is plain total disaster in my opinion as
>> it silently breaks history shape.
>
> I think there's some confusion here.
>
> You said you always did `git pull --rebase`, not
> `git pull --rebase=merges`.

Yep, I was lazy and didn't say `git pull --rebase=merges`, sorry for
confusion.

Though in fact my phrase was meant to stress that I use rebase as
opposed to merge, and I left the details, in fact because I thought
--rebase=merges sounds even more confusing in this context.

Thanks,
-- Sergey Organov