git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
To: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't ignore transport_disconnect error codes in fetch and clone
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 04:56:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <874ka5z9pz.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210928001726.2592734-1-mh@glandium.org>


On Tue, Sep 28 2021, Mike Hommey wrote:

> When a remote-helper fails in a way that is not directly visible in the
> remote-helper protocol, the helper failure is ignored by git during
> fetch or clone.
>
> For example, a helper cannot directly report an error during an `import`
> command (short of sending `feature done` to the fast-import file
> descriptor and not sending a `done` later on).
>
> Or if the helper crashes at the wrong moment, git doesn't notice and
> thinks everything went well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>
> ---
>  builtin/clone.c | 5 +++--
>  builtin/fetch.c | 6 +++---
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> What I'm not sure about is whether a message should be explicitly
> printed by git itself in those cases.
>
> diff --git a/builtin/clone.c b/builtin/clone.c
> index 66fe66679c..f26fa027c5 100644
> --- a/builtin/clone.c
> +++ b/builtin/clone.c
> @@ -1398,7 +1398,7 @@ int cmd_clone(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>  	submodule_progress = transport->progress;
>  
>  	transport_unlock_pack(transport);
> -	transport_disconnect(transport);
> +	err = transport_disconnect(transport);
>  
>  	if (option_dissociate) {
>  		close_object_store(the_repository->objects);
> @@ -1406,7 +1406,8 @@ int cmd_clone(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>  	}
>  
>  	junk_mode = JUNK_LEAVE_REPO;
> -	err = checkout(submodule_progress);
> +	if (!err)
> +		err = checkout(submodule_progress);
>  
>  	free(remote_name);
>  	strbuf_release(&reflog_msg);

This seems buggy in some cases, e.g. just because we couldn't close()
some final socket we should just not run the checkout at all? Shouldn't
we note the disconnect status, but still see if we can do the checkout
etc?

> diff --git a/builtin/fetch.c b/builtin/fetch.c
> index 25740c13df..66bccf6f50 100644
> --- a/builtin/fetch.c
> +++ b/builtin/fetch.c
> @@ -1886,7 +1886,7 @@ static int fetch_one(struct remote *remote, int argc, const char **argv,
>  {
>  	struct refspec rs = REFSPEC_INIT_FETCH;
>  	int i;
> -	int exit_code;
> +	int exit_code, disconnect_code;
>  	int maybe_prune_tags;
>  	int remote_via_config = remote_is_configured(remote, 0);
>  


> @@ -1952,9 +1952,9 @@ static int fetch_one(struct remote *remote, int argc, const char **argv,
>  	exit_code = do_fetch(gtransport, &rs);
>  	sigchain_pop(SIGPIPE);
>  	refspec_clear(&rs);
> -	transport_disconnect(gtransport);
> +	disconnect_code = transport_disconnect(gtransport);
>  	gtransport = NULL;
> -	return exit_code;
> +	return exit_code || disconnect_code;
>  }
>  
>  int cmd_fetch(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)

This seems like it really needs fixes in other areas,
i.e. disconnect_git() returns 0 unconditionally, but should check at
least finish_connect(), no?

Also once that's done you'll have a logic error here where you're
conflating exit and error codes, we should not return -1 from main() (we
do in a few cases, but it's nasty)>

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-28  2:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-28  0:17 [PATCH] Don't ignore transport_disconnect error codes in fetch and clone Mike Hommey
2021-09-28  2:56 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [this message]
2021-10-05  4:54   ` Mike Hommey
2021-10-05 12:21     ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=874ka5z9pz.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com \
    --to=avarab@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=mh@glandium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).