From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Kastrup Subject: Re: git-svn and a nested branches folder Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 16:46:10 +0200 Message-ID: <86veaqebf1.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> References: <46DD6EEA.9010304@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Sep 04 16:46:55 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ISZg5-000138-6v for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2007 16:46:53 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754238AbXIDOqt (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Sep 2007 10:46:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754194AbXIDOqs (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Sep 2007 10:46:48 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:39927 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754186AbXIDOqs (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Sep 2007 10:46:48 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1ISZfl-00016L-SD for git@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2007 16:46:34 +0200 Received: from pd95b0fdb.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([217.91.15.219]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 04 Sep 2007 16:46:33 +0200 Received: from dak by pd95b0fdb.dip0.t-ipconnect.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 04 Sep 2007 16:46:33 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pd95b0fdb.dip0.t-ipconnect.de User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:lI0+rX7Mh3Lif1pzIt94+/73nvs= Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Russ Brown writes: > I'm having some trouble with using git-svn to fetch a repository, and I > think it's because the repository doesn't store branches as a flat list > directly under the 'branches' directory. > > Basically, we have a structure like this: > > | > +-trunk > +-tags > +-branches > + category-a > + branch-a > + branch-b > + category-b > + branch-c > + branch-d > > etc. category-a and category-b are simple directories created using svn > mkdir. The branches are created using svn cp. > > It helps us to organise the branches better, but the rationale is > besides the point. The problem is that git-svn seems to want to > treat category-a and category-b as branches, which isn't right at > all. As a result, git-svn seems to skip most (if not all) revisions > that occur in these directories and creates a lot of entries in > unhandled.log. So what did you specify in your .git/config file regarding the svn structure? -- David Kastrup