From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Kastrup Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow shell scripts to run with non-Bash /bin/sh Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 02:05:32 +0200 Message-ID: <86abrfy377.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> References: <20070921214346.GF97288@void.codelabs.ru> <7v8x6zinjf.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Sep 22 02:06:01 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IYsVR-0003El-TT for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 22 Sep 2007 02:05:58 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753069AbXIVAFu (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Sep 2007 20:05:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753025AbXIVAFu (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Sep 2007 20:05:50 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:57605 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752095AbXIVAFt (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Sep 2007 20:05:49 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IYsV8-00044P-Nr for git@vger.kernel.org; Sat, 22 Sep 2007 00:05:38 +0000 Received: from pd95b0fdb.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([217.91.15.219]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2007 00:05:38 +0000 Received: from dak by pd95b0fdb.dip0.t-ipconnect.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2007 00:05:38 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pd95b0fdb.dip0.t-ipconnect.de User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:drMXymAIxM3Gk7gWe88t6v+dF9k= Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano writes: > I do not doubt that "while case $# in 0) break ;; esac" does not > work for your shell. But I think the above comment is grossly > misleading. Personally, I find this idiom distasteful. I'd do either while case $# in 0) false ;; *) true esac or, more likely while : do case $# in 0) break;; esac But doing a break inside of the while _condition_ rather than the body just feels wrong to me. -- David Kastrup