From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Kastrup Subject: Re: Git and OpenDocument (OpenOffice.org) files Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:58:04 +0200 Message-ID: <866431rser.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> References: <7vps19jnm1.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20070827130346.GA8821@glandium.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Aug 27 16:00:15 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IPf8U-0006Xb-9e for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:00:10 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753844AbXH0OAG (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:00:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751770AbXH0OAG (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:00:06 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:50455 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753366AbXH0OAF (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:00:05 -0400 Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IPf8M-0002T1-7J for git@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:00:02 +0200 Received: from pd95b0fdb.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([217.91.15.219]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:00:02 +0200 Received: from dak by pd95b0fdb.dip0.t-ipconnect.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:00:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pd95b0fdb.dip0.t-ipconnect.de User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:kePWHXT/1l8Ps8v8d6ChN0KyL5g= Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: > On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Mike Hommey wrote: > >> BTW, wouldn't it be more efficient to store the odf files unzipped ? > > Efficient how? Speed-wise: no. Space-wise: yes. Huh? At least the "Space-wise: yes" seems rather nonsensical. "Speed-wise" is not as clear: it depends on the relation between memory/disk bandwidth and decompression speed. -- David Kastrup