From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97B6F2027C for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 12:33:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751110AbdE3MdL (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 May 2017 08:33:11 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:60086 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750898AbdE3MdK (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 May 2017 08:33:10 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EEFC61B8F; Tue, 30 May 2017 12:33:10 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 2EEFC61B8F Authentication-Results: ext-mx10.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx10.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lersek@redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 2EEFC61B8F Received: from lacos-laptop-7.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-116-87.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.116.87]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 909F9183E6; Tue, 30 May 2017 12:33:09 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: FORMAT_PATCH_NAME_MAX increase From: Laszlo Ersek To: =?UTF-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsCBCamFybWFzb24=?= Cc: Git Mailing List References: <99ac8ee7-67b5-5ae7-51cf-6be38de6217f@redhat.com> Message-ID: <85970ab4-e9c8-c6b6-11d3-faafd3ed0708@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 14:33:08 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.39]); Tue, 30 May 2017 12:33:10 +0000 (UTC) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org (apologies for the self-followup:) On 05/30/17 14:28, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > Note that in such an incremental review, I specifically wish to compare > patches against each other (i.e., I'd like to see diffs of diffs, AKA > interdiffs), and not the source tree at two, v1<->v2, commits into the > two series. The latter would only give me the difference between the v1 > and v2 patch application results, and while that is valuable as well, > I'd really like to diff the actual patches. ... One (but not the only) reason for that is that I'd like to see the v1->v2 commit message improvements as well. I quite frequently suggest commit message improvements in review. Thanks Laszlo