From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4987E1F910 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 13:56:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=github.com header.i=@github.com header.b="QBEj3P2z"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230443AbiKJN4p (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Nov 2022 08:56:45 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38550 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229656AbiKJN4o (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Nov 2022 08:56:44 -0500 Received: from mail-qv1-xf2f.google.com (mail-qv1-xf2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4433B178A4 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 05:56:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qv1-xf2f.google.com with SMTP id i12so1411257qvs.2 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 05:56:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=c39ecbgBX8IrH6Bx+ebIpg4nB2jWKS2ReorJQQVFaxc=; b=QBEj3P2zZpqhAfUTCvUPLUa3nk6fJEx+gZDEQO4Taiot9lA30Ktqh3T04PLQThmJhN eqmrpc0hZj06C2AYRgBvbY3XMFpA8EhBaV9/WSinLnUzSgzd9M5ZHYpa0w372v54Lwxr xUTD4z0fpvGeX1GIUuko7lFrfGaN8tM7Sj2kVOXFktBJNc/J+JMIWRvWhwT/T4KJG842 OUHgewl6Y5+nyMXiz4AYm+VjMNo6uDpDaQXu3EYRiib+YnVqTYkuQmtgl+ssfN/daOsh dOJmeukyR10QReA1jHSWYmwAnk2/DOdWqBEj+p0bY9D5w4motPiYdOLTaCunidOVNZHK ctxQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=c39ecbgBX8IrH6Bx+ebIpg4nB2jWKS2ReorJQQVFaxc=; b=xaLovIfZpAp7x5oo8jBgF3Pa0y/QzTIoPrbH8+zUN70PtSEtrpP/JKSI+Csx3nMR9c XmMvGV6bDoo4ZIY+B8AMqeUvHWSR8EbGliKyutcxY4LTM/6VINqaAhjE+iiiRT0tpVpx eztJWU7aegkZqX8P3H3q8/4Zz8+0ZdgEsG3dbBRV3/iGJjRi63vOMQKlLuZGhw1ydxB2 Pwl6LMLeB+wSN2GSF1FDfsxb+XIGizMRUXR36OfL5F10rM7oEmT+psfQZ849ObrzNAoE 25yySKUp+TV/w5pVAtFTAzK97BSpUGXTgeXmNb8t118E6GarFWVJJqzBzCI0tCK6QUxI /Ygw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf0l49atch8JWhxsncXY/8fVXn7tcYIdWElBw+WjzDgtWK4V0qfw fnWPilLHTAXPGKC6M1rDjSMH X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM7Q7bMUpnQIHTrTt/YsrlTq7ix4KxdfufeFOBA8ihA5py46UIu0/EZuvieeVW8PZH3a9TmrKw== X-Received: by 2002:a0c:e512:0:b0:4bb:95ea:d6d with SMTP id l18-20020a0ce512000000b004bb95ea0d6dmr59804377qvm.72.1668088602210; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 05:56:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2600:1700:e72:80a0:8dc6:f062:5d1c:cdbf? ([2600:1700:e72:80a0:8dc6:f062:5d1c:cdbf]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bx12-20020a05622a090c00b0039c7b9522ecsm11438631qtb.35.2022.11.10.05.56.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 10 Nov 2022 05:56:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <83b9ff0b-a655-714e-a8f9-44b0d1ac3177@github.com> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 08:56:41 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH] tests(scalar): tighten the stale `scalar.repo` test some To: Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org Cc: Johannes Schindelin References: Content-Language: en-US From: Derrick Stolee In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On 11/10/2022 2:28 AM, Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget wrote: > From: Johannes Schindelin > > As pointed out by Stolee, the previous incarnation of this test case was > not stringent enough: we want to verify that _only_ the stale entries > are removed (previously, the test case would have succeeded even if all > entries had been removed). Thanks for tightening the test! LGTM. -Stolee