From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Alex Riesen" Subject: Re: What's in git.git Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 14:46:46 +0100 Message-ID: <81b0412b0602220546k95d3b6ar35bb770e6e9c43e4@mail.gmail.com> References: <7v8xs3pt8c.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Feb 22 14:46:58 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FBuKV-0001WJ-HZ for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 14:46:55 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751282AbWBVNqs (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Feb 2006 08:46:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751283AbWBVNqs (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Feb 2006 08:46:48 -0500 Received: from nproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.182.195]:29931 "EHLO nproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751282AbWBVNqs convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Feb 2006 08:46:48 -0500 Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id l24so923898nfc for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 05:46:46 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Knwyc40KNISNHHAp17xg0N4jW3tY0E7jGzbyMC3a3/7CJamfdy62HMIDH0cJ2SwaGMvJkwzWQRS0KsuHF92177sCY4/75m7hA9xM9JNh2xkk4bXobZqbYHyooggLZOssPEdlWx3SRdjBNi7E0oWlwjaFS+VtVfh5TU7O73JeZT0= Received: by 10.49.18.20 with SMTP id v20mr1859889nfi; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 05:46:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.88.16 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 05:46:46 -0800 (PST) To: "Junio C Hamano" In-Reply-To: <7v8xs3pt8c.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 2/22/06, Junio C Hamano wrote: > - Perl 5.6 backward compatibility. > > Alex Riesen volunteered to further work on porting the > "allegedly 5.6 compatible" constructs these patches use to > work on ActiveState (whose 5.8 does not grok them). We'll > see what happens. Well, I'll have to. The alternative is Perforce which is too much pain to explain...