From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] HEAD, ORIG_HEAD and FETCH_HEAD are really special. Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:08:59 -0700 Message-ID: <7vzlzy162s.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1189115308.30308.9.camel@koto.keithp.com> <7vsl5r8jer.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <1189133898.30308.58.camel@koto.keithp.com> <7vd4wu67qs.fsf_-_@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <1189181313.30308.97.camel@koto.keithp.com> <7vejha43oh.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <87r6lab0rw.wl%cworth@cworth.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Nicolas Pitre , Keith Packard , Git Mailing List To: Carl Worth X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Sep 08 00:09:17 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ITm0p-0006H8-4B for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2007 00:09:15 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758596AbXIGWJK (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Sep 2007 18:09:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753624AbXIGWJI (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Sep 2007 18:09:08 -0400 Received: from rune.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.210.124.37]:49735 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750989AbXIGWJI (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Sep 2007 18:09:08 -0400 Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by rune.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74C7F13049E; Fri, 7 Sep 2007 18:09:23 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87r6lab0rw.wl%cworth@cworth.org> (Carl Worth's message of "Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:53:23 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Carl Worth writes: > On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 13:32:30 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> So I am all for making an ambiguous refname an error in 1.5.4. > > If you do, then please also make it an error to create an ambiguous > refname as well. Yeah, didn't I also suggest that already?