From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] apply: get rid of --index-info in favor of --build-fake-ancestor Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:18:43 -0700 Message-ID: <7vzlzkygf0.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7v7imozzgm.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Sep 18 02:19:49 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IXQof-0004uQ-Hk for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 02:19:49 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757033AbXIRASt (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Sep 2007 20:18:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756929AbXIRASt (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Sep 2007 20:18:49 -0400 Received: from rune.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.210.124.37]:44809 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756829AbXIRASs (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Sep 2007 20:18:48 -0400 Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by rune.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FE5A136FF6; Mon, 17 Sep 2007 20:19:07 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:04:40 +0100 (BST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: > Hi, > > On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> Johannes Schindelin writes: >> >> > Suggested by Junio, but the errors are all mine. >> > >> > I am not quite certain, though, if there is really no porcelain >> > using that option. It has been around since Oct 7 2005 (!), so >> > there is a real chance that StGit, guilt or QGit use it. In that >> > case, this patch is obviously wrong. >> >> You do not have to do the deprecating/removing part if that is >> the issue. > > I'd rather avoid keeping this code, if nobody uses it anyway... > > So I cloned StGit and guilt (the two porcelains that I feel are most used, > apart from what is in git.git, and I'm too lazy to find that mail > analysing the recent Git survey). Neither of them has any --index-info in > their complete history. > > So I'm more confident now that there is no need to keep --index-info. Ok, fair enough.