From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Multiple -M options for git-cvsimport Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:07:46 -0800 Message-ID: <7vzltkj14d.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1204193904-3652-1-git-send-email-book@cpan.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com To: "Philippe Bruhat (BooK)" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Feb 28 21:09:03 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JUp3c-0001kc-9v for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 21:08:44 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752937AbYB1UIE (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:08:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752503AbYB1UID (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:08:03 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:59263 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752297AbYB1UIA (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:08:00 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 355F2213A; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:07:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4573E2138; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:07:49 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <1204193904-3652-1-git-send-email-book@cpan.org> (Philippe Bruhat's message of "Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:18:20 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Philippe Bruhat (BooK)" writes: > Sending again my series of patches to git-cvsimport, which allow to > use several -M options for giving the regular expressions capturing the > source branch name when merging. Could you be a bit more explicit than "Sending again", describe if it is just a straight resend, or what problems were pointed out in the earlier round (if any) and how they were addressed (or ignored, if any)? Also please Sign-off all your patches. Cover letters do not need one. I'll take a look at them later, when I have enough time to fish for messages and discussions from earlier round in the list archive in order to process this. Thanks.