From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] git bisect old/new Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 10:30:00 -0700 Message-ID: <7vzk87glwn.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1339466625-17461-1-git-send-email-Valentin.Duperray@ensimag.imag.fr> <7v1ull5bld.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Christian Couder , Valentin Duperray , git@vger.kernel.org, Lucien Kong , Franck Jonas , Thomas Nguy , Huynh Khoi Nguyen Nguyen , Matthieu Moy To: Phil Hord X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jun 13 19:30:19 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SerOW-0008Nd-98 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 19:30:12 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754225Ab2FMRaG (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jun 2012 13:30:06 -0400 Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.35]:42590 "EHLO smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752831Ab2FMRaF (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jun 2012 13:30:05 -0400 Received: from smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BAC082FE; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 13:30:04 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=T8AcTSGy//2y1hC/zVFCBHYdTJA=; b=MXkRTE Dwm7reEfP/2Jry+tlGmgdpNcHKgJH/wh0lZkOBaarZVnYSIrAJgzgb7+3Oc3/r/a tLVPC98jtDDGDDoFAw1PAnHDP0PFPv6WLhxdKFFUzMGpgGrD02MlTG/H4eS2rXIp v/4zZu96TzhR22yufIaMXGImFJEBrAIw3uQsg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=qKz3MTDcT4QxN2xhYZh6tku7Wjqfacq4 /1xLYvOrdmhtgGbMsfJ4xZvnfCPm8KZJrbQVlYbk6P13gJq9kkX+6f+k3ikUXCuY JDmPOPOHl5vcJtqHTg9jOewB/MQzwyuRMOawZA8jNXO2ZGHwpG/LIGYD58aYWxIR s+ZQ7UJKVck= Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C4BB82FC; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 13:30:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [98.234.214.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4504082FA; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 13:30:02 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Phil Hord's message of "Tue, 12 Jun 2012 15:41:02 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 684B9C26-B57D-11E1-96B1-FC762E706CDE-77302942!b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Phil Hord writes: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 1:43 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> >> Why not? It is not like we will be adding any more synonym pair >> beyond good/bad, so... > > Previously we discussed using yes/no, among others. > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/182496 Yes, but didn't we dismiss yes/no and others as no better than bad/good after discussing?