From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: What's in git.git Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2006 02:10:49 -0800 Message-ID: <7vy7zpgq1i.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <7vacc5jza6.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <46a038f90603050121u6bccbb71ve78de69ae45b96ad@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Junio C Hamano" , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Mar 05 11:11:39 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FFqDC-0006h5-Q9 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 05 Mar 2006 11:11:39 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752234AbWCEKKw (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Mar 2006 05:10:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752239AbWCEKKw (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Mar 2006 05:10:52 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao05.cox.net ([68.230.241.34]:51681 "EHLO fed1rmmtao05.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752216AbWCEKKv (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Mar 2006 05:10:51 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao05.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20060305100802.VHAX17838.fed1rmmtao05.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Sun, 5 Mar 2006 05:08:02 -0500 To: "Martin Langhoff" In-Reply-To: <46a038f90603050121u6bccbb71ve78de69ae45b96ad@mail.gmail.com> (Martin Langhoff's message of "Sun, 5 Mar 2006 22:21:46 +1300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Martin Langhoff" writes: > I'm somewhat confused by the fact that there are two emacs modes, both > by Alexandre. Which one should I use? Also -- the killer app for > emacs+git would be to leverage the great patch-editing mode in emacs. They are different styles. I've been in VC camp but my understanding is pcl-cvs style integration is closer to whole-tree than VC which is more per-file. I still haven't adjusted to pcl-cvs style yet.. > (of course, if xxdiff and others can help, that'd be cool too, but > currently they seem strangely unable to deal with files with diff3 > conflict markers.) I had pleasant experiences with "xxdiff -U".