From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: merge-recur status Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 14:18:38 -0700 Message-ID: <7vy7tx1uc1.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Aug 09 23:18:54 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GAvRr-0002SO-Md for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 09 Aug 2006 23:18:44 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751382AbWHIVSk (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Aug 2006 17:18:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751383AbWHIVSk (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Aug 2006 17:18:40 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao06.cox.net ([68.230.241.33]:24510 "EHLO fed1rmmtao06.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751382AbWHIVSk (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Aug 2006 17:18:40 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.5.203]) by fed1rmmtao06.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060809211839.VRSN6235.fed1rmmtao06.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Wed, 9 Aug 2006 17:18:39 -0400 To: Johannes Schindelin In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Wed, 9 Aug 2006 23:02:51 +0200 (CEST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: > I tried to wrap my head over it, but seem unable to do so. Also, I do not > find the case 14ALT (which is mentioned in unpack-trees.c:603) in > Documentation/technical/trivial-merge.txt. That is t/t1000-read-tree-m-3way.sh case 14. The current semantics for case 14 used to be called ALT until 3e03aaf simplified the table to reflect the reality, because the "alternative" semantics had been in use for quite some time already back then. I'd like to take a look at 41094b8e, the real trouble that is causing you grief, sometime later, but I'm currently pondering if the one I tag should be called 1.4.2 or 1.4.2-rc4 ;-).