From: Junio C Hamano <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: A note from the maintainer Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 08:32:58 -0700 Message-ID: <email@example.com> (raw) Welcome to git development community. This message is written by the maintainer and talks about how Git project is managed, and how you can work with it. * Mailing list and the community The development is primarily done on the Git mailing list. Help requests, feature proposals, bug reports and patches should be sent to the list address <firstname.lastname@example.org>. You don't have to be subscribed to send messages. The convention on the list is to keep everybody involved on Cc:, so it is unnecessary to ask "Please Cc: me, I am not subscribed". Before sending patches, please read Documentation/SubmittingPatches and Documentation/CodingGuidelines to familiarize yourself with the project convention. If you sent a patch and you did not hear any response from anybody for several days, it could be that your patch was totally uninteresting, but it also is possible that it was simply lost in the noise. Please do not hesitate to send a reminder message in such a case. Messages getting lost in the noise is a sign that people involved don't have enough mental/time bandwidth to process them right at the moment, and it often helps to wait until the list traffic becomes calmer before sending such a reminder. The list archive is available at a few public sites as well: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/ http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=git http://www.spinics.net/lists/git/ and some people seem to prefer to read it over NNTP: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git When you point at a message in a mailing list archive, using gmane is often the easiest to follow by readers, like this: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/27/focus=217 as it also allows people who subscribe to the mailing list as gmane newsgroup to "jump to" the article. Some members of the development community can sometimes also be found on the #git IRC channel on Freenode. Its log is available at: http://colabti.org/irclogger/irclogger_log/git * Reporting bugs When you think git does not behave as you expect, please do not stop your bug report with just "git does not work". "I tried to do X but it did not work" is not much better, neither is "I tried to do X and git did Y, which is broken". It often is that what you expect is _not_ what other people expect, and chances are that what you expect is very different from what people who have worked on git have expected (otherwise, the behavior would have been changed to match that expectation long time ago). Please remember to always state - what you wanted to do; - what you did (the version of git and the command sequence to reproduce the behavior); - what you saw happen; - what you expected to see; and - how the last two are different. See http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html for further hints. * Repositories, branches and documentation. My public git.git repository is at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git/ git://repo.or.cz/alt-git.git https://github.com/git/git https://code.google.com/p/git-core/ Impatient people might have better luck with the latter two (there are a few other mirrors I push into at sourceforge and github as well). Their gitweb interfaces are found at: http://git.kernel.org/?p=git/git.git http://repo.or.cz/w/alt-git.git There are three branches in git.git repository that are not about the source tree of git: "html", "man", and "todo". The "html" and "man" are preformatted documentation from the tip of the "master" branch; the tip of "html" is visible at: http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/ http://git-core.googlecode.com/git-history/html/git.html The above URL is the top-level documentation page, and it may have links to documentation of older releases. The "todo" branch was originally meant to contain a TODO list for me, but is mostly used to keep some helper scripts I use to maintain git. For example, the script that was used to maintain the two documentation branches are found there as dodoc.sh, which may be a good demonstration of how to use a post-update hook to automate a task after pushing into a repository. There are four branches in git.git repository that track the source tree of git: "master", "maint", "next", and "pu". The "master" branch is meant to contain what are very well tested and ready to be used in a production setting. Every now and then, a "feature release" is cut from the tip of this branch and they typically are named with three dotted decimal digits. The last such release was 1.7.7 done on Sept 30, 2011. You can expect that the tip of the "master" branch is always more stable than any of the released versions. Whenever a feature release is made, "maint" branch is forked off from "master" at that point. Obvious, safe and urgent fixes after a feature release are applied to this branch and maintenance releases are cut from it. The maintenance releases are named with four dotted decimal, named after the feature release they are updates to; the last such release was 126.96.36.199. New features never go to this branch. This branch is also merged into "master" to propagate the fixes forward. A new development does not usually happen on "master". When you send a series of patches, after review on the mailing list, a separate topic branch is forked from the tip of "master" and your patches are queued there, and kept out of "master" while people test it out. The quality of topic branches are judged primarily by the mailing list discussions. Topic branches that are in good shape are merged to the "next" branch. In general, the "next" branch always contains the tip of "master". It might not be quite rock-solid production ready, but is expected to work more or less without major breakage. The "next" branch is where new and exciting things take place. A topic that is in "next" is expected to be polished to perfection before it is merged to "master" (that's why "master" can be expected to stay more stable than any released version). The "pu" (proposed updates) branch bundles all the remaining topic branches. The topics on the branch are not complete, well tested, nor well documented and need further work. When a topic that was in "pu" proves to be in testable shape, it is merged to "next". You can run "git log --first-parent master..pu" to see what topics are currently in flight. Sometimes, an idea that looked promising turns out to be not so good and the topic can be dropped from "pu" in such a case. The two branches "master" and "maint" are never rewound, and "next" usually will not be either. After a feature release is made from "master", however, "next" will be rebuilt from the tip of "master" using the topics that didn't make the cut in the feature release. Note that being in "next" is not a guarantee to appear in the next release, nor even in any future release. There were cases that topics needed reverting a few commits in them before graduating to "master", or a topic that already was in "next" was reverted from "next" because fatal flaws were found in it after it was merged. * Other people's trees, trusted lieutenants and credits. Documentation/SubmittingPatches outlines to whom your proposed changes should be sent. As described in contrib/README, I would delegate fixes and enhancements in contrib/ area to the primary contributors of them. Although the following are included in git.git repository, they have their own authoritative repository and maintainers: - git-gui/ comes from git-gui project, maintained by Pat Thoyts: git://repo.or.cz/git-gui.git - gitk-git/ comes from Paul Mackerras's gitk project: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/gitk/gitk.git I would like to thank everybody who helped to raise git into the current shape. Especially I would like to thank the git list regulars whose help I have relied on and expect to continue relying on heavily: - Linus Torvalds, Shawn Pearce, Johannes Schindelin, Nicolas Pitre, René Scharfe, Jeff King, Jonathan Nieder, Johan Herland, Johannes Sixt, Sverre Rabbelier, Michael J Gruber, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason and Thomas Rast on general design and implementation issues and reviews on the mailing list. - Shawn and Nicolas Pitre on pack issues. - Martin Langhoff, Frank Lichtenheld and Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason on cvsserver and cvsimport. - Paul Mackerras on gitk. - Eric Wong, David D. Kilzer and Sam Vilain on git-svn. - Simon Hausmann and Pete Wyckoff on git-p4. - Jakub Narebski, John Hawley, Petr Baudis, Luben Tuikov, Giuseppe Bilotta on gitweb. - J. Bruce Fields, Jonathan Nieder, Michael J Gruber and Thomas Rast on documentation (and countless others for proofreading and fixing). - Alexandre Julliard on Emacs integration. - David Aguilar and Charles Bailey for taking good care of git-mergetool (and Theodore Ts'o for creating it in the first place) and git-difftool. - Johannes Schindelin, Johannes Sixt, Erik Faye-Lund, Pat Thoyts and others for their effort to move things forward on the Windows front. - People on non-Linux platforms for keeping their eyes on portability; especially, Randal Schwartz, Theodore Ts'o, Jason Riedy, Thomas Glanzmann, Brandon Casey, Jeff King, Alex Riesen and countless others. * This document The latest copy of this document is found in git.git repository, on 'todo' branch, as MaintNotes.
next prev reply index Thread overview: 88+ messages in thread (expand / mbox.gz / Atom feed / [top]) 2006-10-24 9:16 Junio C Hamano 2006-10-24 9:37 ` Jakub Narebski 2007-01-02 3:31 Junio C Hamano 2007-01-02 3:47 ` Shawn O. Pearce [not found] <email@example.com> 2007-02-16 22:31 ` Junio C Hamano 2007-02-17 2:35 ` Johannes Schindelin 2007-02-23 6:03 ` Junio C Hamano [not found] <firstname.lastname@example.org> 2007-04-04 18:26 ` Junio C Hamano 2007-05-20 9:54 ` Junio C Hamano [not found] <email@example.com> 2007-09-02 6:34 ` Junio C Hamano 2008-01-08 8:57 Junio C Hamano 2008-01-08 9:57 ` Jakub Narebski 2008-01-08 10:03 ` Junio C Hamano 2008-02-02 4:35 Junio C Hamano 2008-02-02 11:06 ` Jakub Narebski 2008-02-17 9:16 Junio C Hamano 2008-03-09 10:57 ` Junio C Hamano 2008-04-09 9:44 Junio C Hamano [not found] <firstname.lastname@example.org> 2008-06-19 7:24 ` Junio C Hamano 2008-07-14 5:51 ` Junio C Hamano [not found] <email@example.com> 2008-08-17 23:58 ` Junio C Hamano 2008-12-25 6:48 Junio C Hamano 2009-03-04 19:52 Junio C Hamano 2009-05-07 7:09 Junio C Hamano 2009-05-07 13:40 ` Baz 2009-05-07 16:30 ` Junio C Hamano 2009-07-29 21:15 Junio C Hamano 2010-01-01 0:09 Junio C Hamano 2010-02-13 1:24 Junio C Hamano 2010-07-21 22:18 Junio C Hamano 2010-09-19 1:28 Junio C Hamano 2011-01-31 5:51 Junio C Hamano 2011-04-25 21:05 Junio C Hamano 2011-08-24 23:51 Junio C Hamano 2011-10-05 2:22 Junio C Hamano 2011-10-15 5:47 ` Martin von Zweigbergk 2011-10-16 7:24 ` Junio C Hamano 2011-10-24 15:32 Junio C Hamano [this message] [not found] <firstname.lastname@example.org> 2012-01-27 21:41 ` Junio C Hamano 2012-03-06 7:10 Junio C Hamano 2012-06-19 23:53 Junio C Hamano 2012-08-20 3:16 Junio C Hamano 2012-09-18 23:14 Junio C Hamano 2012-10-08 20:08 Junio C Hamano 2012-10-21 22:10 Junio C Hamano 2012-12-10 23:16 Junio C Hamano 2013-01-01 0:27 Junio C Hamano 2013-01-28 20:48 Junio C Hamano 2013-03-13 20:26 Junio C Hamano 2014-11-26 23:09 Junio C Hamano 2015-02-05 22:53 Junio C Hamano 2015-03-06 23:33 Junio C Hamano 2015-03-23 21:38 Junio C Hamano 2015-04-30 19:51 Junio C Hamano 2015-05-08 14:46 ` Christian Couder 2015-05-08 16:25 ` Junio C Hamano 2015-07-15 21:43 Junio C Hamano 2015-08-28 21:12 Junio C Hamano 2015-09-28 23:20 Junio C Hamano 2015-11-05 23:14 Junio C Hamano 2015-11-06 10:50 ` Xue Fuqiao 2015-11-06 17:38 ` Junio C Hamano 2016-01-04 23:44 Junio C Hamano 2016-02-06 0:07 Junio C Hamano 2016-03-28 22:42 Junio C Hamano 2016-04-29 22:04 Junio C Hamano 2016-05-19 17:48 Junio C Hamano 2016-06-13 19:45 Junio C Hamano 2016-07-11 20:14 Junio C Hamano 2016-08-12 19:55 Junio C Hamano 2016-08-12 22:42 ` Eric Wong 2016-08-13 8:10 ` Jeff King 2016-08-13 9:04 ` Eric Wong 2016-08-13 11:14 ` Jeff King 2016-08-14 1:27 ` Eric Wong 2016-08-14 2:12 ` Eric Wong 2016-08-14 12:23 ` Jeff King 2016-08-14 12:19 ` Jeff King 2016-08-14 15:00 ` Philip Oakley 2016-08-14 22:52 ` Eric Wong 2016-09-03 2:17 Junio C Hamano 2016-09-03 10:26 ` Jakub Narębski 2016-09-07 16:16 ` Junio C Hamano 2016-10-03 22:31 Junio C Hamano 2016-11-29 21:24 Junio C Hamano 2017-02-24 19:29 Junio C Hamano 2017-03-20 21:39 Junio C Hamano 2017-03-24 21:19 Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions: You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html * Reply to all the recipients using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list mirror (one of many) Archives are clonable: git clone --mirror https://public-inbox.org/git git clone --mirror http://ou63pmih66umazou.onion/git git clone --mirror http://czquwvybam4bgbro.onion/git git clone --mirror http://hjrcffqmbrq6wope.onion/git Newsgroups are available over NNTP: nntp://news.public-inbox.org/inbox.comp.version-control.git nntp://ou63pmih66umazou.onion/inbox.comp.version-control.git nntp://czquwvybam4bgbro.onion/inbox.comp.version-control.git nntp://hjrcffqmbrq6wope.onion/inbox.comp.version-control.git nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git note: .onion URLs require Tor: https://www.torproject.org/ or Tor2web: https://www.tor2web.org/ AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox