From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: GIT 1.6.0-rc1 Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 23:44:52 -0700 Message-ID: <7vwsj6tsm3.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7vy73myim5.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080728063838.GB4234@blimp.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Alex Riesen X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jul 28 08:46:02 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KNMUb-0005A6-Qt for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 08:46:02 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751833AbYG1GpA (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2008 02:45:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751937AbYG1GpA (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2008 02:45:00 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:32951 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751752AbYG1Go7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2008 02:44:59 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38AAF3F58D; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 02:44:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-211.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 443943F58C; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 02:44:54 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20080728063838.GB4234@blimp.local> (Alex Riesen's message of "Mon, 28 Jul 2008 08:38:38 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: B27F0522-5C70-11DD-9E1C-3113EBD4C077-77302942!a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Alex Riesen writes: > t2103-update-index-ignore-missing.sh still broken on Windows because > of stat.st_size being 0 for directories there. I recall we did not reach a useful conclusion of that discussion.