From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [LHF] making t5000 "tar xf" tests more lenient Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 11:43:31 -0800 Message-ID: <7vwqvrpg9o.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7vwqw7mb09.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <50E8722B.8010408@lsrfire.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: =?utf-8?Q?Ren=C3=A9?= Scharfe X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jan 05 20:43:55 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TrZer-00057b-FI for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 20:43:53 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755864Ab3AETne convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Jan 2013 14:43:34 -0500 Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.35]:55480 "EHLO smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755832Ab3AETnd convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Jan 2013 14:43:33 -0500 Received: from smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 171CDB505; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 14:43:33 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=LChVH8CbfWW7 TbD9Rbr7+S2Tn7g=; b=SqsOXGpE/leG9xDJH1fmfwQI0Fart2af5b+604XU6+Tm SZA48QdNWwJwXSNlXBwxHyFfev9jz6WWbADZiTfYlsdIFUglyuiQpZ3SuPy4kHM7 tqwVwkX0caeLEbJq2OozGn6Z0aBtapQjbCjQz7sCNatLfUzRq6q9IrrZkNWEKFY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=dpwTpm 6E1Q6Hbu0+6i5xakdZ8rA31nuGJrA+SZ9Kp3atwKiI2yirCeEff4JbvHRwxgPEGd ZYL6SnPqzeEOjCAoTdwX5KHZf24JGuvZB9ILXjOI9Q5KvDaxMbKLJOnd/yj/UGjE j+x7fGmN1xEKfe4pdpg9uU5i8PAbgPVIQXtRg= Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06ECCB504; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 14:43:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [98.234.214.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 779A2B502; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 14:43:32 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <50E8722B.8010408@lsrfire.ath.cx> (=?utf-8?Q?=22Ren=C3=A9?= Scharfe"'s message of "Sat, 05 Jan 2013 19:34:19 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 2FD4D976-5770-11E2-A525-F0CE2E706CDE-77302942!b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Ren=C3=A9 Scharfe writes: > Anyway, I don't think the pax headers are to blame here. The patch b= elow > fixes the tar failures for me, but I'm not sure why. There must be > something special about some (not all!) directory entries with traili= ng > slashes after directory names. > > Several ZIP tests still fail, however, because NetBSD's unzip doesn't > seem to support (our flavour of) symlinks and streamed files. Just FYI, I found that unzip that comes with base distro and the one you can add via pkg_add (or pkgin) are different, and the latter seemed to behave better.