From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] t7001: add test for git-mv dir1 dir2/ Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 19:41:04 -0700 Message-ID: <7vvepimoxr.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <200607262039.25155.Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de> <20060728013038.GH13776@pasky.or.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jul 28 04:41:19 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G6IHo-0004y3-Bu for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 04:41:12 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750916AbWG1ClG (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jul 2006 22:41:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751858AbWG1ClG (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jul 2006 22:41:06 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao06.cox.net ([68.230.241.33]:28593 "EHLO fed1rmmtao06.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750916AbWG1ClF (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jul 2006 22:41:05 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.5.203]) by fed1rmmtao06.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060728024105.CGPX6235.fed1rmmtao06.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 22:41:05 -0400 To: Petr Baudis In-Reply-To: <20060728013038.GH13776@pasky.or.cz> (Petr Baudis's message of "Fri, 28 Jul 2006 03:30:38 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Petr Baudis writes: > (i) No git-apply -R - well, it seems to me that I revert patches all > the time, don't you? > > (ii) I'd like git-apply to be as verbose as patch is, that is list > the files it touches as it goes > > (iii) There's no reject handling besides "panic" right now - it should > be able to create .rej files so that the user can fix things up > > (iv) I need git-apply to add/remove to/from index new/gone files, > while at the same time... > > (v) I want to allow applying of patches to working copy that is not > completely clean, even on top of modified files You probably should be able to talk me into doing these, but doesn't it already do (iv) and (v)?