From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3 v2] Make "git-remote rm" delete refs acccording to fetch specs Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2008 01:28:05 -0700 Message-ID: <7vve0tbluy.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20080601042804.GA32293@spearce.org> <7vprr1d8p2.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080601063051.GH12896@spearce.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: "Shawn O. Pearce" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Jun 01 10:29:16 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K2iwF-0008Is-Hj for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 10:29:15 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751961AbYFAI2W (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jun 2008 04:28:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751426AbYFAI2W (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jun 2008 04:28:22 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:44770 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751413AbYFAI2V (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jun 2008 04:28:21 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFBE73DC9; Sun, 1 Jun 2008 04:28:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4AF4C3DC6; Sun, 1 Jun 2008 04:28:15 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20080601063051.GH12896@spearce.org> (Shawn O. Pearce's message of "Sun, 1 Jun 2008 02:30:51 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: B0470EBE-2FB4-11DD-A41A-F9737025C2AA-77302942!a-sasl-fastnet.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Shawn O. Pearce" writes: > I think the behavior in 2/2 and 3/3v2 is the best we can do,... Oh, I think you already know I agree with that. I was just pointing out that the extra niceness would not have mattered that much in practice, but if the code is already written and is not crappy, why not ;-) Not blindly assuming that the remote nickname matches the actualy used namespace under refs/remotes _is_ a good bugfix regardless of the issue of overlapping configuration.