From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] t/Makefile: retain cache t/.prove across prove runs Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 14:18:17 -0700 Message-ID: <7vvcjqa6w6.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1335972712-20621-1-git-send-email-mhagger@alum.mit.edu> <20120502160753.GA7193@sigill.intra.peff.net> <4FB7B429.80805@alum.mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jeff King , git@vger.kernel.org To: Michael Haggerty X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun May 20 23:18:29 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SWDWD-000123-JH for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Sun, 20 May 2012 23:18:25 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756497Ab2ETVSU (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 May 2012 17:18:20 -0400 Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.35]:53119 "EHLO smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756058Ab2ETVSU (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 May 2012 17:18:20 -0400 Received: from smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7098815B; Sun, 20 May 2012 17:18:19 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=0Rw3UckZC91khn9yu/9ur+oUXE0=; b=Ztc7Dd 4NlojVLLTWjv07aX9r0BugY+HnErVnMQP/CXRTLI/V+YkZUD6xLu1EveaOhTYUVa EtD8CsGPREoZWZR20ctA2x8UiBWR22CZLmT83i2nVoKJWaBMaTurhGt1H560501J 3f7lp8UgdlvO+Hcrvqo8RL9fBInTRGo88bN7g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=DuWmMlyfJZ+YLSFoEt6z6MV+g6mZZ1qb E7gWaeaKDNDmthVnaOs4mB8WS5RGFaOyF/gJWbBjQfxx1H6gDGB7xUjG218slsv0 9ghFXclYcZqy0d2jeHxnZteZflx5Z8In1631HGPWc2/LdHZpTDB6c5UyLThF2iCR 52aLaaFehLA= Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADE8F815A; Sun, 20 May 2012 17:18:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [98.234.214.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 46CA88158; Sun, 20 May 2012 17:18:19 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <4FB7B429.80805@alum.mit.edu> (Michael Haggerty's message of "Sat, 19 May 2012 16:54:33 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 526BBA9A-A2C1-11E1-AACD-FC762E706CDE-77302942!b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Michael Haggerty writes: > I still think my patch makes sense. The error that Peff pointed out > was in my commentary, not in the patch itself or in the log message. > Junio, is there something else keeping you from applying this patch? No. I was waiting just in case if anything other than "Ah, that does indeed not work but it does not mean this patch is wrong" comes out (e.g. "With the patch it does not work as pointed out, but I made it also work by this reroll, which also is correct") to avoid the trouble of applying and replacing. Thanks.