From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: remote#branch Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 20:40:06 -0700 Message-ID: <7vtzo9s221.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20071016021933.GH12156@machine.or.cz> <20071016210904.GI26127@efreet.light.src> <20071027204757.GA3058@efreet.light.src> <20071029174000.GA4449@efreet.light.src> <20071029214925.GH21133@thunk.org> <20071030030104.GK21133@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Linus Torvalds , Jan Hudec , Johannes Schindelin , Petr Baudis , Paolo Ciarrocchi , git@vger.kernel.org To: Theodore Tso X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Oct 30 04:40:38 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Imhxx-0007Px-Fs for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2007 04:40:33 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752433AbXJ3DkU (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:40:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752315AbXJ3DkU (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:40:20 -0400 Received: from sceptre.pobox.com ([207.106.133.20]:45200 "EHLO sceptre.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751878AbXJ3DkT (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:40:19 -0400 Received: from sceptre (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by sceptre.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 885E32EF; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:40:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sceptre.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF4D68F280; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:40:31 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20071030030104.GK21133@thunk.org> (Theodore Tso's message of "Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:01:04 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Theodore Tso writes: > It would probably also be a good idea to expurgate URL's from the > documentations, because, well, they aren't URL's. Git doesn't treat > them like URL's, and you've said you aren't interested in changing git > to treat them like URL's, and finally git:// isn't a registered URL > scheme name with the IANA registration authority. So let's not call > them URL's, since they're clearly not. Are you playing reverse psychology, encouraging us to switch to RFC-conforming quoting?