From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: What's in git.git (stable) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 12:45:16 -0800 Message-ID: <7vtzk7xqg3.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7v8x27iui1.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vd4r24ox6.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vir0o44mt.fsf_-_@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Jakub Narebski X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Feb 17 21:46:10 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JQqOm-0001nY-OK for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2008 21:46:09 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752297AbYBQUpe (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Feb 2008 15:45:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752401AbYBQUpe (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Feb 2008 15:45:34 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:39377 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752297AbYBQUpd (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Feb 2008 15:45:33 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88BC16BA6; Sun, 17 Feb 2008 15:45:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A39A46BA5; Sun, 17 Feb 2008 15:45:25 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Jakub Narebski's message of "Sun, 17 Feb 2008 05:39:26 -0800 (PST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jakub Narebski writes: >> commit: discard index after setting up partial commit > > IIRC there was also request for proper solution; this was more a hack. It is not a hack at all. The more fundamental improvement was along the lines of what I suggested soon after Kristian's initial round was posted, but what the current code does is not wrong nor hack. It is about a partial commit after all and is not performance critical either.