From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Update git-send-email-script with --compose Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2005 13:38:01 -0700 Message-ID: <7vslwj2qty.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <11258971871874-git-send-email-ryan@michonline.com> <46a038f905090504166246dc0a@mail.gmail.com> <20050905153705.GD5335@mythryan2.michonline.com> <7vll2b4ake.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <46a038f90509051306212d4e93@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Ryan Anderson , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Sep 05 22:39:04 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ECNjb-0004UH-32 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 22:38:31 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932281AbVIEUiE (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Sep 2005 16:38:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932346AbVIEUiE (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Sep 2005 16:38:04 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao05.cox.net ([68.230.241.34]:17840 "EHLO fed1rmmtao05.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932281AbVIEUiD (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Sep 2005 16:38:03 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao05.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20050905203801.PEKE6784.fed1rmmtao05.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 16:38:01 -0400 To: martin.langhoff@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <46a038f90509051306212d4e93@mail.gmail.com> (Martin Langhoff's message of "Tue, 6 Sep 2005 08:06:50 +1200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Martin Langhoff writes: > Fair enough -- blame it on my primitive approach of only having 2 > working repositories, and having some patches in them that I'm not > pushing upstream. Exporting to mbox would mean that I have to edit the > mbox file to remove the patches I don't intend to publish. > > ... and on my naive reading of git-send-email documentation -- it > doesn't mention mbox format at all, so I assumed it would expect one > patch per file. Not really; --mbox output is one-file-per-patch and it is up to you which ones to pick and concatenate them in what order, if you want them in a single file.