From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] send-pack: abort sideband demuxer on pack-objects error Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:21:31 -0700 Message-ID: <7vsjtkfs10.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20110331184243.GA12027@sigill.intra.peff.net> <201104142136.25778.j6t@kdbg.org> <20110414202110.GA6525@sigill.intra.peff.net> <201104142243.33522.j6t@kdbg.org> <20110414205113.GA7451@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Johannes Sixt , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Apr 14 23:21:51 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QATz5-00074B-28 for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 23:21:51 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753497Ab1DNVVp (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Apr 2011 17:21:45 -0400 Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:63089 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753476Ab1DNVVn (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Apr 2011 17:21:43 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B66C552E; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 17:23:40 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=ZOjQsSUStZ+M3TK1CqiNqX7fy0g=; b=ib7mi5 9j7s+75jUbgF9L8/PTt7FL/1iX60TSxvUkdS364hfjpW6P83qHVDVu8BXKs9z51q QqzmVY11wMVlVuRPhwO+LZNKc9BQnrNFLJP1ZIn8JbDC1N6/1wAP0VjGZxRf/die lVsqe1HbO3dZd7C9EAa1/aNkkPYmrpGTGLdFk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=C8LEbfCfxkV/Ri2vrNI13xpCHE+Vcadi APj3hjpHNXIDdF13FkPuy2bcP54XMQaYJjWUHtXssYihp4UbJ8jo3V5dEcts03iC Hreccy6vDUP/0PBvvjfEjwnXCBlP2KS1hm7xZojR42egtp/HBheGhA5nBxNO4cYL wl0hbEMw5dY= Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDEE6552D; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 17:23:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [76.102.170.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C95BB552C; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 17:23:31 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20110414205113.GA7451@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:51:13 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 75057D3C-66DD-11E0-A8F5-E8AB60295C12-77302942!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King writes: > I think I am leaning a bit towards (2a). It's simple, and it's not like > this is library code with a million unknown callers; fixing it simply > and cleanly with a nice commit message is probably sufficient. This really sounds like a plan. Even if we _might_ later want to go to 2b. or some other solution, we will know what pattern to grep for. Thanks.