From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [LHF] making t5000 "tar xf" tests more lenient Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 12:11:39 -0800 Message-ID: <7vsj6fpeys.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7vwqw7mb09.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <50E8722B.8010408@lsrfire.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: =?utf-8?Q?Ren=C3=A9?= Scharfe X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jan 05 21:12:03 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Tra66-00059k-Lk for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 21:12:02 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755854Ab3AEULn convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Jan 2013 15:11:43 -0500 Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.35]:35017 "EHLO smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755843Ab3AEULm convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Jan 2013 15:11:42 -0500 Received: from smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30EC3BD01; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 15:11:41 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=WaOHwfQtZEQ9 Qw51oYC0DPsJQzw=; b=ea7QgwaKl8GpNU61LcH6C2TvmKMoxdhP9h8OjvtH8sDe fNbYsAU0AHadO4Ovwl2NaQSo5ZTvWlffIoMSOPaviWGV057PdN0BpiaWah0i28OI pGRLijfDO7GrNR6qXdGITW7S0sjz/yGA6GmaL9suYr2i6+GzjpKFZ0kUTQ+GHiY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=ufDR4H a+H1gjFIZGMVxQplCq9rsimNDefV5ZJOqz12J1LV0SHytiSn5A/OxA1jQkXguaod rmHX7z8XmUgTP+7RHUAcwT/Ql8TEu6oVApDEoizsMypH5mNRT9/PZB2bFlQGv5M3 jna/YL8celCdy4+PJQLKngJViAfNlBI0Z8990= Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20735BD00; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 15:11:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [98.234.214.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9750CBCFF; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 15:11:40 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <50E8722B.8010408@lsrfire.ath.cx> (=?utf-8?Q?=22Ren=C3=A9?= Scharfe"'s message of "Sat, 05 Jan 2013 19:34:19 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 1E09153C-5774-11E2-97B1-F0CE2E706CDE-77302942!b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Ren=C3=A9 Scharfe writes: > Anyway, I don't think the pax headers are to blame here. Hmph, I am reasonably sure I saw a test that created an archive from a commit (hence with pax header), asked platform tar to either list the contents or actually extracted to the filesystem, and tried to ensure nothing but the paths in the repository existed in the archive. When the platform tar implementation treated the pax header as an extra file, such a test sees something not in the repository and fails. This was on (and I am still on) NetBSD 6.0 not 6.0.1, by the way.