git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFH] Merge driver
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 21:58:52 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vr7bwxks3.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7v3boen0rb.fsf_-_@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Fri, 09 Sep 2005 00:44:40 -0700")

Some people may be alarmed and feel concerned that I already
have Daniel's and Fredrik's merge in the "master" branch; I feel
this deserves some clarification.

The change Daniel made is a natural enhancement of an existing
program.  It spent unusually long time in the proposed update
queue exactly because read-tree was so fundamental, and I wanted
to make sure there is no serious regression.  Most importantly,
the original merge mechanism, git-resolve, is not dropped, and
'git-pull' uses that, not 'git-merge', after fetching a remote
head.  So for everyday use, nothing has changed.

I did the 'git-merge' strategy backend mechanism because I
wanted to play it safe.  It makes it easy to give the set of
conservative strategies as default for every day use, while
allowing us to try more experimental strategies which can be
used only by an explicit user request.  Introduction of
additional merge strategies, such as the Fredrik merge or
rename-detect merge which is yet to be written, is in a sense
similar to adding new filesystems to the stable kernel tree --
as long as they stay optional and do not touch the core deeply,
they tend to be safer changes than other kinds, and we can add
them more or less anytime in the stable series without impacting
stability.

I intend to eventually update git-pull to use git-merge, and I
am hoping that I can do so before we hit 1.0, once we are sure
that 'git-merge -s stupid' behaves identically as 'git-resolve',
and 'git-merge -s resolve' fares no worse than 'git-resolve'.  I
personally feel I've done enough tests to ensure that already,
but help from the community is as always appreciated.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-09-11  4:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-07 16:47 [PATCH 0/2] A new merge algorithm, take 3 Fredrik Kuivinen
2005-09-07 16:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] Add '-i' flag to read-tree to make it ignore whats in the working directory Fredrik Kuivinen
2005-09-11  2:54   ` Unified merge driver pushed out to "master" branch Junio C Hamano
2005-09-11 21:05     ` Fredrik Kuivinen
2005-09-12  1:23       ` Junio C Hamano
2005-09-14  5:56     ` Another merge test case from the kernel tree Junio C Hamano
2005-09-14 16:11       ` Daniel Barkalow
2005-09-14 16:30         ` Junio C Hamano
2005-09-14 17:42       ` Fredrik Kuivinen
2005-09-14 17:51         ` Junio C Hamano
2005-09-15  0:47       ` Yet another set of merge test cases " Junio C Hamano
2005-09-19 16:13         ` Fredrik Kuivinen
2005-09-20  1:53           ` Junio C Hamano
2005-09-20  5:50             ` Fredrik Kuivinen
2005-09-07 16:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] A new merge algorithm Fredrik Kuivinen
2005-09-07 18:33 ` [PATCH 0/2] A new merge algorithm, take 3 Daniel Barkalow
2005-09-08  6:06   ` Fredrik Kuivinen
2005-09-08 15:27     ` Daniel Barkalow
2005-09-08 20:05       ` Fredrik Kuivinen
2005-09-08 21:27         ` Daniel Barkalow
2005-09-07 18:36 ` Junio C Hamano
     [not found]   ` <431F34FF.5050301@citi.umich.edu>
     [not found]     ` <7vvf1cz64l.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
2005-09-08 15:06       ` Chuck Lever
2005-09-08 16:51         ` Junio C Hamano
2005-09-08 17:19           ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-08 17:51             ` Junio C Hamano
2005-09-08 18:16             ` Chuck Lever
2005-09-08 18:35               ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-08 18:58                 ` Chuck Lever
2005-09-08 20:59                   ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-09  7:44                   ` [RFH] Merge driver Junio C Hamano
2005-09-09 16:05                     ` Daniel Barkalow
2005-09-09 16:43                       ` Junio C Hamano
2005-09-09 17:25                         ` Daniel Barkalow
2005-09-11  4:58                     ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2005-09-12 21:08                     ` Fredrik Kuivinen
2005-09-12 21:16                       ` Junio C Hamano
2005-09-13 20:33                         ` Fredrik Kuivinen
2005-09-13 20:46                           ` Junio C Hamano
2005-09-08 20:54   ` [PATCH 0/2] A new merge algorithm, take 3 Junio C Hamano
2005-09-08 21:23     ` A Large Angry SCM

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7vr7bwxks3.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net \
    --to=junkio@cox.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).