From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Tool renames. Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 01:03:39 -0700 Message-ID: <7vr7bqahb8.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <200509050054.j850sC3D023778@laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl> <46a038f90509051713389c62c8@mail.gmail.com> <7vll2atz8a.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vwtlusi9t.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7v1x41g3c6.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vfysg2wvo.fsf_-_@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <43290D0F.9060408@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, davidk@lysator.liu.se, Linus Torvalds , Daniel Barkalow X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Sep 15 10:05:38 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EFoih-0002Qz-9y for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 10:03:47 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750821AbVIOIDo (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Sep 2005 04:03:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750843AbVIOIDo (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Sep 2005 04:03:44 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao02.cox.net ([68.230.241.37]:39845 "EHLO fed1rmmtao02.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750818AbVIOIDm (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Sep 2005 04:03:42 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao02.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20050915080340.DCYI7185.fed1rmmtao02.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 04:03:40 -0400 To: "H. Peter Anvin" In-Reply-To: <43290D0F.9060408@zytor.com> (H. Peter Anvin's message of "Wed, 14 Sep 2005 22:56:31 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "H. Peter Anvin" writes: > I noticed you also renamed git-ssh-{push,pull}. These tools rely on > having the same names on both sides, so you have introduced a major > version skew problem. True. It seems that both myself and Daniel did not think that would be a major problem when we were discussing the tool renames. As a workaround, you could always say GIT_SSH_PULL='blah' and GIT_SSH_PUSH='bah' when you run either side to name what will be run on the other end. Now the interesting problem is if we should rename these environment variables ...