From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: "fatal: Untracked working tree file 'so-and-so' would be overwritten by merge" Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 09:55:39 -0700 Message-ID: <7vr6xhcttg.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <7v7izaf62c.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vodsmdq0m.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Oct 09 18:58:33 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GWyPo-0006bQ-Cg for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2006 18:55:44 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932979AbWJIQzl (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Oct 2006 12:55:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932981AbWJIQzl (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Oct 2006 12:55:41 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao02.cox.net ([68.230.241.37]:24721 "EHLO fed1rmmtao02.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932979AbWJIQzk (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Oct 2006 12:55:40 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao02.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20061009165540.ZTBI12581.fed1rmmtao02.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 12:55:40 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id YGvi1V0191kojtg0000000 Mon, 09 Oct 2006 12:55:43 -0400 To: Linus Torvalds In-Reply-To: (Linus Torvalds's message of "Mon, 9 Oct 2006 09:03:08 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Linus Torvalds writes: > If the local index doesn't change, we should not print out the "Removing > 'so-and-so'" message, but we should also not even _touch_ that file, > because it was already "gone" as far as the local tree was concerned. > > Agreed? Yes.