From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] retain reflogs for deleted refs Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 16:29:29 -0700 Message-ID: <7vr4r6xvom.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20120719213225.GA20311@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20120719213311.GA20385@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7vy5mftm3q.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Alexey Muranov To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Aug 17 01:29:40 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T29VS-0004Av-2A for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 01:29:38 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932654Ab2HPX3d (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:29:33 -0400 Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.35]:58721 "EHLO smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932527Ab2HPX3c (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:29:32 -0400 Received: from smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 072569057; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:29:32 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=X7gP2mrn0tBeNrE89OVBU9GVu6w=; b=tkfmNk dILPJR7QDePeM08wsGg2R+gEbTXz5jn56+PiXxOMMU9ND11BW6keUi+IRFSo6OaP 7TYr84ggo3nuVaAqtE3Bj4NMTTnBMZNq5VIkK2hrbJAf8IcV7cgieMvSSIBor2rT vrGbCAgEwNA3+wCJEGgZifQNcab4j+90RVX8k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=jjt/jH76Gouq5XfTMSXo1fpbzkFwu1yU +bPaRc0vQJRTIZv4y3o6aqlqzyzS2YrlyRW0k5Ch55s0xrigz/R95pMfjdXfBmd9 30isT8ZQAsv5A7o7+Jg0J1PwFXj6piPWInVo2NyKDYplN77clH9RN6hcOHKiV2Wm OGJvN452RA8= Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E238D9056; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:29:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [98.234.214.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 612AD9053; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:29:31 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <7vy5mftm3q.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Thu, 19 Jul 2012 15:36:09 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 3AE98A72-E7FA-11E1-9DCF-01B42E706CDE-77302942!b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano writes: > I like the general direction. Perhaps a long distant future > direction could be to also use the same trick in the ref namespace > so that we can have 'next' branch itself, and 'next/foo', 'next/bar' > forks that are based on the 'next' branch at the same time (it > obviously is a totally unrelated topic)? I notice that I was responsible for making this topic veer in the wrong direction by bringing up a new feature "having 'next' and 'next/bar' at the same time" which nobody asked. Perhaps we can drop that for now to simplify the scope of the topic, to bring the log graveyard back on track?