From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
To: Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz>
Cc: Steven Cole <elenstev@mesatop.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>, Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] I2C and W1 bugfixes for 2.6.12-rc2
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 15:45:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vpswqpes1.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050419222609.GE9305@pasky.ji.cz> (Petr Baudis's message of "Wed, 20 Apr 2005 00:26:10 +0200")
>>>>> "PB" == Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz> writes:
PB> I'm wondering if doing
PB> if [ "$(show-diff)" ]; then
PB> git diff | git apply
PB> else
PB> checkout-cache -f -a
PB> fi
PB> would actually buy us some time; or, how common is it for people to have
PB> no local changes whatsoever, and whether relative slowdown of additional
PB> show-diff to git diff would actually matter.
"show-diff -s" perhaps. Also wouldn't it be faster to pipe
show-diff output (not git diff output) to patch (not git apply)?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-19 22:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-19 4:39 [GIT PATCH] I2C and W1 bugfixes for 2.6.12-rc2 Greg KH
2005-04-19 18:58 ` Greg KH
2005-04-19 19:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-19 19:47 ` Greg KH
2005-04-19 20:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-19 21:40 ` Greg KH
2005-04-19 22:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-19 22:27 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-04-19 22:33 ` Greg KH
2005-04-19 23:04 ` Kenneth Johansson
2005-04-19 22:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-19 22:29 ` Martin Schlemmer
2005-04-19 22:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-19 23:11 ` Martin Schlemmer
2005-04-20 0:01 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2005-04-19 22:52 ` Lars Fenneberg
2005-04-19 22:39 ` Petr Baudis
2005-04-19 22:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-19 22:19 ` Steven Cole
2005-04-19 22:26 ` Petr Baudis
2005-04-19 22:45 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2005-04-19 22:58 ` Petr Baudis
2005-04-19 22:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-19 23:02 ` Petr Baudis
2005-04-19 23:04 ` Steven Cole
2005-04-19 23:16 ` Petr Baudis
2005-04-19 23:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-19 23:41 ` Steven Cole
2005-04-20 16:56 ` Zlatko Calusic
2005-04-20 17:15 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7vpswqpes1.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net \
--to=junkio@cox.net \
--cc=elenstev@mesatop.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pasky@ucw.cz \
--cc=sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).