From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] [git-p4] Detect exec bit in more cases. Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 15:53:52 -0700 Message-ID: <7vodfxj6db.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <119022570352-git-send-email-git@davidb.org> <200709192103.53526.simon@lst.de> <20070920151637.GA26873@old.davidb.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Simon Hausmann To: David Brown X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Sep 21 00:54:44 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IYUuy-0008Og-5e for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 00:54:44 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750913AbXITWyF (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Sep 2007 18:54:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750797AbXITWyE (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Sep 2007 18:54:04 -0400 Received: from rune.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.210.124.37]:50681 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750699AbXITWyD (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Sep 2007 18:54:03 -0400 Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by rune.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA09C138E25; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 18:54:16 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20070920151637.GA26873@old.davidb.org> (David Brown's message of "Thu, 20 Sep 2007 08:16:37 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: David Brown writes: > On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 09:03:50PM +0200, Simon Hausmann wrote: >>On Wednesday 19 September 2007 20:15:03 David Brown wrote: > >>> git-p4 was missing the execute bit setting if the file had other attribute >>> bits set. >>> --- > >>I'm fine with this, so unless you find a better way: >> >>Acked-By: Simon Hausmann > > I sent out an improved version of this patch yesterday > <1190232768445-git-send-email-git@davidb.org> that I'd like to get > approved. I guess I'm not quite sure what happens at this point with a > patch. I still have that *768445* message as "the last one proposed as better than previous ones" in my mbox. Simon?