From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: git-send-email is omitting author and date lines Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 11:43:29 -0700 Message-ID: <7vodfraoq6.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1190585633.29937.44.camel@localhost> <7v4phlc668.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20070924110817.GA15797@lapse.madduck.net> <20070924173014.GB27816@lapse.madduck.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Johannes Schindelin , Hanspeter Kunz , git@vger.kernel.org To: martin f krafft X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Sep 24 20:43:47 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IZsuF-0006hP-G9 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:43:43 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755913AbXIXSnh (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:43:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755926AbXIXSnh (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:43:37 -0400 Received: from rune.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.210.124.37]:54815 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755598AbXIXSng (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:43:36 -0400 Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by rune.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51C22139456; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:43:53 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20070924173014.GB27816@lapse.madduck.net> (martin f. krafft's message of "Mon, 24 Sep 2007 18:30:14 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: martin f krafft writes: > also sprach Johannes Schindelin [2007.09.24.1210 +0100]: >> And that is perfectly okay, since as far as the public is >> concerned, this is the date of the patch. > > If you say so. I don't find this at all convincing. I think that is the reasoning for the current behaviour of send-email, but it is not unreasonable to have an option to always add in-body From: and Date: headers to send-email, with a blessing from a recent post from Linus to the kernel mailing list: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/582450 Notice the part he says he appreciates Andrew's practice and talks about message being further forwarded by somebody else.