From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] for-each-ref: utilize core.warnambiguousrefs for strict refname:short format Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 16:58:56 -0700 Message-ID: <7vod1ieptr.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1222074591-26548-1-git-send-email-bert.wesarg@googlemail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, szeder@ira.uka.de, Bert Wesarg To: "Shawn O. Pearce" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Oct 18 02:00:23 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KqzF0-0003Ro-0B for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 18 Oct 2008 02:00:22 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755597AbYJQX7G (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Oct 2008 19:59:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755549AbYJQX7F (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Oct 2008 19:59:05 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:64710 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755544AbYJQX7D (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Oct 2008 19:59:03 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 043028B6AE; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 19:59:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-211.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9175E8B6AB; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 19:58:57 -0400 (EDT) User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 92F627FE-9CA7-11DD-BE37-4F5276724C3F-77302942!a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Shawn, was there any issue with this one? The patch changes the function signature for no good reason (at least, it does not have anything to do with the stated purpose of the change), but other than that, I think what it attempts to do makes sense.